MAYBE 922.43/297.04 MAYBE 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 922.43/297.04 certificate MAYBE. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Strict Trs: 922.43/297.04 { first(X1, X2) -> n__first(X1, X2) 922.43/297.04 , first(0(), X) -> nil() 922.43/297.04 , first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, n__first(X, activate(Z))) 922.43/297.04 , s(X) -> n__s(X) 922.43/297.04 , activate(X) -> X 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__first(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2)) 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__from(X)) -> from(activate(X)) 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) 922.43/297.04 , from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(n__s(X))) 922.43/297.04 , from(X) -> n__from(X) } 922.43/297.04 Obligation: 922.43/297.04 runtime complexity 922.43/297.04 Answer: 922.43/297.04 MAYBE 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 922.43/297.04 following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Computation stopped due to timeout after 297.0 seconds. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'With Problem ... (timeout of 148 seconds) (timeout of 297 922.43/297.04 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'Fastest' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'With Problem ...' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to the 922.43/297.04 following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 The processor is inapplicable, reason: 922.43/297.04 Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due 922.43/297.04 to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 The processor is inapplicable, reason: 922.43/297.04 Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 24 seconds) (timeout of 297 seconds)' 922.43/297.04 failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 None of the processors succeeded. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Details of failed attempt(s): 922.43/297.04 ----------------------------- 922.43/297.04 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 922.43/297.04 failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' 922.43/297.04 failed due to the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 3) 'Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 297 seconds)' failed due to 922.43/297.04 the following reason: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 We add the following weak dependency pairs: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Strict DPs: 922.43/297.04 { first^#(X1, X2) -> c_1(X1, X2) 922.43/297.04 , first^#(0(), X) -> c_2() 922.43/297.04 , first^#(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> c_3(Y, X, activate^#(Z)) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(X) -> c_5(X) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__first(X1, X2)) -> 922.43/297.04 c_6(first^#(activate(X1), activate(X2))) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__from(X)) -> c_7(from^#(activate(X))) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__s(X)) -> c_8(s^#(activate(X))) 922.43/297.04 , s^#(X) -> c_4(X) 922.43/297.04 , from^#(X) -> c_9(X, X) 922.43/297.04 , from^#(X) -> c_10(X) } 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 and mark the set of starting terms. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 922.43/297.04 certificate MAYBE. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Strict DPs: 922.43/297.04 { first^#(X1, X2) -> c_1(X1, X2) 922.43/297.04 , first^#(0(), X) -> c_2() 922.43/297.04 , first^#(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> c_3(Y, X, activate^#(Z)) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(X) -> c_5(X) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__first(X1, X2)) -> 922.43/297.04 c_6(first^#(activate(X1), activate(X2))) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__from(X)) -> c_7(from^#(activate(X))) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__s(X)) -> c_8(s^#(activate(X))) 922.43/297.04 , s^#(X) -> c_4(X) 922.43/297.04 , from^#(X) -> c_9(X, X) 922.43/297.04 , from^#(X) -> c_10(X) } 922.43/297.04 Strict Trs: 922.43/297.04 { first(X1, X2) -> n__first(X1, X2) 922.43/297.04 , first(0(), X) -> nil() 922.43/297.04 , first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, n__first(X, activate(Z))) 922.43/297.04 , s(X) -> n__s(X) 922.43/297.04 , activate(X) -> X 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__first(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2)) 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__from(X)) -> from(activate(X)) 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) 922.43/297.04 , from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(n__s(X))) 922.43/297.04 , from(X) -> n__from(X) } 922.43/297.04 Obligation: 922.43/297.04 runtime complexity 922.43/297.04 Answer: 922.43/297.04 MAYBE 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 We estimate the number of application of {2} by applications of 922.43/297.04 Pre({2}) = {1,3,4,5,8,9,10}. Here rules are labeled as follows: 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 DPs: 922.43/297.04 { 1: first^#(X1, X2) -> c_1(X1, X2) 922.43/297.04 , 2: first^#(0(), X) -> c_2() 922.43/297.04 , 3: first^#(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> c_3(Y, X, activate^#(Z)) 922.43/297.04 , 4: activate^#(X) -> c_5(X) 922.43/297.04 , 5: activate^#(n__first(X1, X2)) -> 922.43/297.04 c_6(first^#(activate(X1), activate(X2))) 922.43/297.04 , 6: activate^#(n__from(X)) -> c_7(from^#(activate(X))) 922.43/297.04 , 7: activate^#(n__s(X)) -> c_8(s^#(activate(X))) 922.43/297.04 , 8: s^#(X) -> c_4(X) 922.43/297.04 , 9: from^#(X) -> c_9(X, X) 922.43/297.04 , 10: from^#(X) -> c_10(X) } 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the 922.43/297.04 certificate MAYBE. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Strict DPs: 922.43/297.04 { first^#(X1, X2) -> c_1(X1, X2) 922.43/297.04 , first^#(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> c_3(Y, X, activate^#(Z)) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(X) -> c_5(X) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__first(X1, X2)) -> 922.43/297.04 c_6(first^#(activate(X1), activate(X2))) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__from(X)) -> c_7(from^#(activate(X))) 922.43/297.04 , activate^#(n__s(X)) -> c_8(s^#(activate(X))) 922.43/297.04 , s^#(X) -> c_4(X) 922.43/297.04 , from^#(X) -> c_9(X, X) 922.43/297.04 , from^#(X) -> c_10(X) } 922.43/297.04 Strict Trs: 922.43/297.04 { first(X1, X2) -> n__first(X1, X2) 922.43/297.04 , first(0(), X) -> nil() 922.43/297.04 , first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, n__first(X, activate(Z))) 922.43/297.04 , s(X) -> n__s(X) 922.43/297.04 , activate(X) -> X 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__first(X1, X2)) -> first(activate(X1), activate(X2)) 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__from(X)) -> from(activate(X)) 922.43/297.04 , activate(n__s(X)) -> s(activate(X)) 922.43/297.04 , from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(n__s(X))) 922.43/297.04 , from(X) -> n__from(X) } 922.43/297.04 Weak DPs: { first^#(0(), X) -> c_2() } 922.43/297.04 Obligation: 922.43/297.04 runtime complexity 922.43/297.04 Answer: 922.43/297.04 MAYBE 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 922.43/297.04 Arrrr.. 923.11/297.62 EOF