Certification Problem
Input (COPS 5)
We consider the TRS containing the following rules:
|
f(g(x,a,b)) |
→ |
x |
(1) |
|
p(a) |
→ |
c |
(2) |
|
g(f(h(c,d)),x,y) |
→ |
h(p(x),q(x)) |
(3) |
|
q(b) |
→ |
d |
(4) |
The underlying signature is as follows:
{f/1, g/3, a/0, b/0, p/1, c/0, h/2, d/0, q/1}Property / Task
Prove or disprove confluence.Answer / Result
No.Proof (by csi @ CoCo 2020)
1 Non-Joinable Fork
The system is not confluent due to the following forking derivations.
| t0
|
= |
f(g(f(h(c,d)),a,b)) |
|
→
|
f(h(p(a),q(a))) |
|
= |
t1
|
| t0
|
= |
f(g(f(h(c,d)),a,b)) |
|
→
|
f(h(c,d)) |
|
= |
t1
|
The two resulting terms cannot be joined for the following reason:
-
The reachable terms of these two terms are approximated via the following two tree automata,
and the tree automata have an empty intersection.
-
Automaton 1
-
final states:
{1}
-
transitions:
|
h(5,3) |
→ |
6 |
| c |
→ |
5 |
|
q(2) |
→ |
3 |
|
p(4) |
→ |
5 |
| a |
→ |
2 |
| a |
→ |
4 |
|
f(6) |
→ |
1 |
The automaton is closed under rewriting as it is compatible.
-
Automaton 2
-
final states:
{7}
-
transitions:
|
h(9,8) |
→ |
10 |
| c |
→ |
9 |
|
f(10) |
→ |
7 |
| d |
→ |
8 |
The automaton is closed under rewriting as it is compatible.