Certification Problem
Input (COPS 721)
We consider the TRS containing the following rules:
| b |
→ |
h(b,a) |
(1) |
| b |
→ |
h(f(b),f(h(b,a))) |
(2) |
The underlying signature is as follows:
{b/0, h/2, a/0, f/1}Property / Task
Prove or disprove confluence.Answer / Result
No.Proof (by csi @ CoCo 2023)
1 Non-Joinable Fork
The system is not confluent due to the following forking derivations.
| t0
|
= |
b |
|
→
|
h(f(b),f(h(b,a))) |
|
= |
t1
|
The two resulting terms cannot be joined for the following reason:
- When applying the cap-function on both terms (where variables may be treated like constants)
then the resulting terms do not unify.