The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
implies(not(x),y) | → | or(x,y) | (1) |
implies(not(x),or(y,z)) | → | implies(y,or(x,z)) | (2) |
implies(x,or(y,z)) | → | or(y,implies(x,z)) | (3) |
final states:
{0, 1}
transitions:
not0(0) | → | 0 |
or0(0,0) | → | 0 |
implies0(0,0) | → | 1 |
or1(0,0) | → | 1 |
or1(0,0) | → | 2 |
implies1(0,2) | → | 1 |
implies1(0,0) | → | 3 |
or1(0,3) | → | 1 |
or1(0,2) | → | 1 |
or1(0,0) | → | 3 |
implies1(0,2) | → | 3 |
or1(0,3) | → | 3 |
implies2(0,0) | → | 4 |
or2(0,4) | → | 1 |
or1(0,2) | → | 3 |
or2(0,4) | → | 3 |
or1(0,0) | → | 4 |
implies1(0,2) | → | 4 |
or1(0,3) | → | 4 |
or1(0,2) | → | 4 |
or2(0,4) | → | 4 |