Certification Problem
Input (TPDB SRS_Relative/Waldmann_19/random-142)
The relative rewrite relation R/S is considered where R is the following TRS
a(a(b(x1))) |
→ |
a(c(b(x1))) |
(1) |
c(c(c(x1))) |
→ |
a(b(a(x1))) |
(2) |
b(c(b(x1))) |
→ |
b(a(c(x1))) |
(3) |
and S is the following TRS.
b(b(c(x1))) |
→ |
c(a(b(x1))) |
(4) |
b(b(b(x1))) |
→ |
a(b(b(x1))) |
(5) |
b(b(c(x1))) |
→ |
b(c(c(x1))) |
(6) |
b(a(a(x1))) |
→ |
a(c(c(x1))) |
(7) |
Property / Task
Prove or disprove termination.Answer / Result
Yes.Proof (by ttt2 @ termCOMP 2023)
1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over (3 x 3)-matrices with strict dimension 1
over the naturals
[a(x1)] |
= |
· x1 +
|
[b(x1)] |
= |
· x1 +
|
[c(x1)] |
= |
· x1 +
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
b(c(b(x1))) |
→ |
b(a(c(x1))) |
(3) |
1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over (3 x 3)-matrices with strict dimension 1
over the naturals
[a(x1)] |
= |
· x1 +
|
[b(x1)] |
= |
· x1 +
|
[c(x1)] |
= |
· x1 +
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
b(b(c(x1))) |
→ |
c(a(b(x1))) |
(4) |
b(b(b(x1))) |
→ |
a(b(b(x1))) |
(5) |
b(b(c(x1))) |
→ |
b(c(c(x1))) |
(6) |
1.1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
[a(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1 + 20 |
[b(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1 + 6 |
[c(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1 + 16 |
all of the following rules can be deleted.
a(a(b(x1))) |
→ |
a(c(b(x1))) |
(1) |
b(a(a(x1))) |
→ |
a(c(c(x1))) |
(7) |
1.1.1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
Knuth Bendix order with w0 = 1 and the following precedence and weight functions
prec(c) |
= |
0 |
|
weight(c) |
= |
5 |
|
|
|
prec(a) |
= |
1 |
|
weight(a) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
prec(b) |
= |
3 |
|
weight(b) |
= |
5 |
|
|
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
c(c(c(x1))) |
→ |
a(b(a(x1))) |
(2) |
1.1.1.1.1 R is empty
There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.