The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(a(b(d(b(d(a(x1))))))) | → | a(a(c(a(a(b(d(x1))))))) | (1) |
a(a(c(x1))) | → | c(c(a(a(x1)))) | (2) |
c(c(c(x1))) | → | b(d(c(b(d(x1))))) | (3) |
a(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | d(b(a(a(c(a(a(x1))))))) | (4) |
c(a(a(x1))) | → | a(a(c(c(x1)))) | (5) |
c(c(c(x1))) | → | d(b(c(d(b(x1))))) | (6) |
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | a#(a(c(a(a(x1))))) | (7) |
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | a#(c(a(a(x1)))) | (8) |
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | c#(a(a(x1))) | (9) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | a#(a(c(c(x1)))) | (10) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | a#(c(c(x1))) | (11) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | c#(c(x1)) | (12) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | c#(x1) | (13) |
c#(c(c(x1))) | → | c#(d(b(x1))) | (14) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | a#(c(a(a(x1)))) | (8) |
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | a#(a(c(a(a(x1))))) | (7) |
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | c#(a(a(x1))) | (9) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | a#(a(c(c(x1)))) | (10) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | a#(c(c(x1))) | (11) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | c#(c(x1)) | (12) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | c#(x1) | (13) |
[a#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[d(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[c(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[c#(x1)] | = |
|
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | a#(c(a(a(x1)))) | (8) |
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | a#(a(c(a(a(x1))))) | (7) |
a#(d(b(d(b(a(a(x1))))))) | → | c#(a(a(x1))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | c#(x1) | (13) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | c#(c(x1)) | (12) |
[c#(x1)] | = | 1 · x1 |
[a(x1)] | = | 1 + 1 · x1 |
[c(x1)] | = | 1 · x1 |
[d(x1)] | = | 0 |
[b(x1)] | = | 1 + 1 · x1 |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | c#(x1) | (13) |
c#(a(a(x1))) | → | c#(c(x1)) | (12) |
There are no pairs anymore.