The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(a(x1)) | → | b(a(c(b(x1)))) | (1) |
b(b(x1)) | → | a(a(x1)) | (2) |
c(a(x1)) | → | x1 | (3) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | b#(a(c(b(x1)))) | (4) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | a#(c(b(x1))) | (5) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | c#(b(x1)) | (6) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | b#(x1) | (7) |
b#(b(x1)) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (8) |
b#(b(x1)) | → | a#(x1) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
b#(b(x1)) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (8) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | b#(a(c(b(x1)))) | (4) |
b#(b(x1)) | → | a#(x1) | (9) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | a#(c(b(x1))) | (5) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | b#(x1) | (7) |
[a#(x1)] | = | -1 + 2 · x1 |
[b#(x1)] | = | -1 + 2 · x1 |
[b(x1)] | = | 1 + x1 |
[a(x1)] | = | 1 + x1 |
[c(x1)] | = | -1 + x1 |
b#(b(x1)) | → | a#(x1) | (9) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | a#(c(b(x1))) | (5) |
a#(a(x1)) | → | b#(x1) | (7) |
[b#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[a#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||
[c(x1)] | = |
|
a#(a(x1)) | → | b#(a(c(b(x1)))) | (4) |
[a(x1)] | = | 1 · x1 |
[b(x1)] | = | 1 · x1 |
[c(x1)] | = | 1 · x1 |
[b#(x1)] | = | 1 + 2 · x1 |
[a#(x1)] | = | 2 · x1 |
b#(b(x1)) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (8) |
There are no pairs anymore.