The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a(b(a(b(x1)))) | (1) |
a(a(b(a(x1)))) | → | a(b(b(a(x1)))) | (2) |
a(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | b(b(a(a(x1)))) | (3) |
a#(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (4) |
a#(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(x1)) | (5) |
a#(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | a#(x1) | (6) |
a#(a(b(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(b(a(x1)))) | (7) |
a#(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(a(b(x1)))) | (8) |
The dependency pairs are split into 2 components.
a#(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | a#(x1) | (6) |
a#(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (4) |
[a(x1)] | = | x1 + 2438 |
[b(x1)] | = | x1 + 1542 |
[a#(x1)] | = | x1 + 0 |
a(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a(b(a(b(x1)))) | (1) |
a(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | b(b(a(a(x1)))) | (3) |
a(a(b(a(x1)))) | → | a(b(b(a(x1)))) | (2) |
a#(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | a#(x1) | (6) |
a#(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (4) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.
a#(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(a(b(x1)))) | (8) |
a#(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(x1)) | (5) |
[a(x1)] | = | x1 + 42736 |
[b(x1)] | = | x1 + 42736 |
[a#(x1)] | = | x1 + 0 |
a(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a(b(a(b(x1)))) | (1) |
a(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | b(b(a(a(x1)))) | (3) |
a(a(b(a(x1)))) | → | a(b(b(a(x1)))) | (2) |
a#(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(x1)) | (5) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
a#(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(a(b(x1)))) | (8) |
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a#(x1)] | = |
|
a(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a(b(a(b(x1)))) | (1) |
a(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | b(b(a(a(x1)))) | (3) |
a(a(b(a(x1)))) | → | a(b(b(a(x1)))) | (2) |
a#(b(b(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(a(b(x1)))) | (8) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.