The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(a(b(b(x1)))) | → | a(b(a(a(x1)))) | (1) |
a(x1) | → | b(b(b(x1))) | (2) |
b(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a(a(b(a(x1)))) | (3) |
a(x1) | → | b(b(b(x1))) | (2) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | b#(a(x1)) | (4) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(a(x1))) | (5) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a#(a(b(a(x1)))) | (6) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(x1) | (7) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(x1)) | (8) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(b(x1))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | b#(a(x1)) | (4) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(a(x1))) | (5) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(x1) | (7) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a#(a(b(a(x1)))) | (6) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(x1)) | (8) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(b(x1))) | (9) |
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[b#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a#(x1)] | = |
|
b(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a(a(b(a(x1)))) | (3) |
a(x1) | → | b(b(b(x1))) | (2) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | b#(a(x1)) | (4) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a#(b(a(x1))) | (5) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
a#(x1) | → | b#(x1) | (7) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a#(a(b(a(x1)))) | (6) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(x1)) | (8) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(b(x1))) | (9) |
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[b#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a#(x1)] | = |
|
b(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a(a(b(a(x1)))) | (3) |
a(x1) | → | b(b(b(x1))) | (2) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(x1)) | (8) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
a#(x1) | → | b#(x1) | (7) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a#(a(b(a(x1)))) | (6) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(b(x1))) | (9) |
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[b#(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a#(x1)] | = |
|
b(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a(a(b(a(x1)))) | (3) |
a(x1) | → | b(b(b(x1))) | (2) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(x1) | (7) |
b#(b(a(a(x1)))) | → | a#(a(b(a(x1)))) | (6) |
a#(x1) | → | b#(b(b(x1))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.