The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(a(x1))))))))) | → | a(a(b(b(a(a(b(a(a(b(b(a(x1)))))))))))) | (1) |
a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a(b(b(a(a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))))))))) | (2) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(x1) | (3) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(b(b(a(a(x1))))) | (4) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(b(b(a(a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))))))))) | (5) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))))) | (6) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (7) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))) | (8) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1))))))))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(x1) | (3) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))))) | (6) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (7) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1))))))))) | (9) |
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a#(x1)] | = |
|
a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a(b(b(a(a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))))))))) | (2) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(a(x1)) | (7) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1))))))))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(x1) | (3) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))))) | (6) |
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[a#(x1)] | = |
|
a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a(b(b(a(a(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))))))))) | (2) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(x1) | (3) |
a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(b(x1))))))))) | → | a#(b(a(a(b(b(a(a(x1)))))))) | (6) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.