Certification Problem
Input (TPDB TRS_Innermost/Transformed_CSR_innermost_04/PALINDROME_nosorts_noand_C)
The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
|
active(__(__(X,Y),Z)) |
→ |
mark(__(X,__(Y,Z))) |
(1) |
|
active(__(X,nil)) |
→ |
mark(X) |
(2) |
|
active(__(nil,X)) |
→ |
mark(X) |
(3) |
|
active(U11(tt)) |
→ |
mark(U12(tt)) |
(4) |
|
active(U12(tt)) |
→ |
mark(tt) |
(5) |
|
active(isNePal(__(I,__(P,I)))) |
→ |
mark(U11(tt)) |
(6) |
|
active(__(X1,X2)) |
→ |
__(active(X1),X2) |
(7) |
|
active(__(X1,X2)) |
→ |
__(X1,active(X2)) |
(8) |
|
active(U11(X)) |
→ |
U11(active(X)) |
(9) |
|
active(U12(X)) |
→ |
U12(active(X)) |
(10) |
|
active(isNePal(X)) |
→ |
isNePal(active(X)) |
(11) |
|
__(mark(X1),X2) |
→ |
mark(__(X1,X2)) |
(12) |
|
__(X1,mark(X2)) |
→ |
mark(__(X1,X2)) |
(13) |
|
U11(mark(X)) |
→ |
mark(U11(X)) |
(14) |
|
U12(mark(X)) |
→ |
mark(U12(X)) |
(15) |
|
isNePal(mark(X)) |
→ |
mark(isNePal(X)) |
(16) |
|
proper(__(X1,X2)) |
→ |
__(proper(X1),proper(X2)) |
(17) |
|
proper(nil) |
→ |
ok(nil) |
(18) |
|
proper(U11(X)) |
→ |
U11(proper(X)) |
(19) |
|
proper(tt) |
→ |
ok(tt) |
(20) |
|
proper(U12(X)) |
→ |
U12(proper(X)) |
(21) |
|
proper(isNePal(X)) |
→ |
isNePal(proper(X)) |
(22) |
|
__(ok(X1),ok(X2)) |
→ |
ok(__(X1,X2)) |
(23) |
|
U11(ok(X)) |
→ |
ok(U11(X)) |
(24) |
|
U12(ok(X)) |
→ |
ok(U12(X)) |
(25) |
|
isNePal(ok(X)) |
→ |
ok(isNePal(X)) |
(26) |
|
top(mark(X)) |
→ |
top(proper(X)) |
(27) |
|
top(ok(X)) |
→ |
top(active(X)) |
(28) |
The evaluation strategy is innermost.Property / Task
Prove or disprove termination.Answer / Result
Yes.Proof (by AProVE @ termCOMP 2023)
1 Rule Removal
Using the
| prec(__) |
= |
1 |
|
stat(__) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(nil) |
= |
2 |
|
stat(nil) |
= |
lex
|
| prec(tt) |
= |
0 |
|
stat(tt) |
= |
lex
|
| π(active) |
= |
1 |
| π(__) |
= |
[1,2] |
| π(mark) |
= |
1 |
| π(nil) |
= |
[] |
| π(U11) |
= |
1 |
| π(tt) |
= |
[] |
| π(U12) |
= |
1 |
| π(isNePal) |
= |
1 |
| π(proper) |
= |
1 |
| π(ok) |
= |
1 |
| π(top) |
= |
1 |
all of the following rules can be deleted.
|
active(__(__(X,Y),Z)) |
→ |
mark(__(X,__(Y,Z))) |
(1) |
|
active(__(X,nil)) |
→ |
mark(X) |
(2) |
|
active(__(nil,X)) |
→ |
mark(X) |
(3) |
|
active(isNePal(__(I,__(P,I)))) |
→ |
mark(U11(tt)) |
(6) |
1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [active(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [U11(x1)] |
= |
2 + 2 · x1
|
| [tt] |
= |
0 |
| [mark(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [U12(x1)] |
= |
1 + 1 · x1
|
| [__(x1, x2)] |
= |
2 · x1 + 2 · x2
|
| [isNePal(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [proper(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [nil] |
= |
0 |
| [ok(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [top(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
|
active(U11(tt)) |
→ |
mark(U12(tt)) |
(4) |
|
active(U12(tt)) |
→ |
mark(tt) |
(5) |
1.1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [active(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [__(x1, x2)] |
= |
2 · x1 + 2 · x2
|
| [U11(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1
|
| [U12(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [isNePal(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1
|
| [mark(x1)] |
= |
1 + 1 · x1
|
| [proper(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [nil] |
= |
0 |
| [ok(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [tt] |
= |
0 |
| [top(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
|
__(mark(X1),X2) |
→ |
mark(__(X1,X2)) |
(12) |
|
__(X1,mark(X2)) |
→ |
mark(__(X1,X2)) |
(13) |
|
U11(mark(X)) |
→ |
mark(U11(X)) |
(14) |
|
isNePal(mark(X)) |
→ |
mark(isNePal(X)) |
(16) |
|
top(mark(X)) |
→ |
top(proper(X)) |
(27) |
1.1.1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [active(x1)] |
= |
1 + 2 · x1
|
| [__(x1, x2)] |
= |
2 + 1 · x1 + 1 · x2
|
| [U11(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [U12(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [isNePal(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [mark(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1
|
| [proper(x1)] |
= |
2 + 2 · x1
|
| [nil] |
= |
0 |
| [ok(x1)] |
= |
2 + 2 · x1
|
| [tt] |
= |
0 |
| [top(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
|
active(__(X1,X2)) |
→ |
__(active(X1),X2) |
(7) |
|
active(__(X1,X2)) |
→ |
__(X1,active(X2)) |
(8) |
|
top(ok(X)) |
→ |
top(active(X)) |
(28) |
1.1.1.1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [active(x1)] |
= |
1 + 2 · x1
|
| [U11(x1)] |
= |
2 + 2 · x1
|
| [U12(x1)] |
= |
1 + 1 · x1
|
| [isNePal(x1)] |
= |
2 + 2 · x1
|
| [mark(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [proper(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1
|
| [__(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 + 1 · x1 + 2 · x2
|
| [nil] |
= |
2 |
| [ok(x1)] |
= |
1 + 1 · x1
|
| [tt] |
= |
2 |
all of the following rules can be deleted.
|
active(U11(X)) |
→ |
U11(active(X)) |
(9) |
|
active(U12(X)) |
→ |
U12(active(X)) |
(10) |
|
active(isNePal(X)) |
→ |
isNePal(active(X)) |
(11) |
|
proper(__(X1,X2)) |
→ |
__(proper(X1),proper(X2)) |
(17) |
|
proper(nil) |
→ |
ok(nil) |
(18) |
|
proper(U11(X)) |
→ |
U11(proper(X)) |
(19) |
|
proper(tt) |
→ |
ok(tt) |
(20) |
|
proper(U12(X)) |
→ |
U12(proper(X)) |
(21) |
|
proper(isNePal(X)) |
→ |
isNePal(proper(X)) |
(22) |
|
__(ok(X1),ok(X2)) |
→ |
ok(__(X1,X2)) |
(23) |
|
U11(ok(X)) |
→ |
ok(U11(X)) |
(24) |
|
isNePal(ok(X)) |
→ |
ok(isNePal(X)) |
(26) |
1.1.1.1.1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
Knuth Bendix order with w0 = 1 and the following precedence and weight functions
| prec(U12) |
= |
2 |
|
weight(U12) |
= |
2 |
|
|
|
| prec(mark) |
= |
0 |
|
weight(mark) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
| prec(ok) |
= |
1 |
|
weight(ok) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
|
U12(mark(X)) |
→ |
mark(U12(X)) |
(15) |
|
U12(ok(X)) |
→ |
ok(U12(X)) |
(25) |
1.1.1.1.1.1.1 R is empty
There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.