The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a(f,a(g,a(g,a(f,x)))) | (1) |
a(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a(g,a(f,a(f,a(g,x)))) | (2) |
a#(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a#(f,a(f,a(g,x))) | (3) |
a#(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a#(f,a(g,a(g,a(f,x)))) | (4) |
a#(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a#(g,a(f,a(f,a(g,x)))) | (5) |
a#(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a#(g,a(g,a(f,x))) | (6) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
a#(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a#(g,a(g,a(f,x))) | (6) |
a#(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a#(g,a(f,a(f,a(g,x)))) | (5) |
a#(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a#(f,a(g,a(g,a(f,x)))) | (4) |
a#(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a#(f,a(f,a(g,x))) | (3) |
[a(x1, x2)] | = | max(x1 + 1, 0) |
[f] | = | 0 |
[a#(x1, x2)] | = | max(x1 + 11293, x2 + 11294, 0) |
[g] | = | 3 |
a(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a(f,a(g,a(g,a(f,x)))) | (1) |
a(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a(g,a(f,a(f,a(g,x)))) | (2) |
a#(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a#(f,a(f,a(g,x))) | (3) |
The dependency pairs are split into 2 components.
a#(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a#(f,a(g,a(g,a(f,x)))) | (4) |
[a(x1, x2)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
[f] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
[a#(x1, x2)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
[g] | = |
|
a(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a(f,a(g,a(g,a(f,x)))) | (1) |
a(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a(g,a(f,a(f,a(g,x)))) | (2) |
a#(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a#(f,a(g,a(g,a(f,x)))) | (4) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.
a#(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a#(g,a(f,a(f,a(g,x)))) | (5) |
[a(x1, x2)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
[f] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
[a#(x1, x2)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
[g] | = |
|
a(f,a(g,a(f,x))) | → | a(f,a(g,a(g,a(f,x)))) | (1) |
a(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a(g,a(f,a(f,a(g,x)))) | (2) |
a#(g,a(f,a(g,x))) | → | a#(g,a(f,a(f,a(g,x)))) | (5) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.