Certification Problem
Input (TPDB TRS_Standard/AG01/#3.53a)
The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
g(x,y) |
→ |
x |
(1) |
g(x,y) |
→ |
y |
(2) |
f(s(x),y,y) |
→ |
f(y,x,s(x)) |
(3) |
Property / Task
Prove or disprove termination.Answer / Result
Yes.Proof (by ttt2 @ termCOMP 2023)
1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over (3 x 3)-matrices with strict dimension 1
over the naturals
[s(x1)] |
= |
· x1 +
|
[g(x1, x2)] |
= |
· x1 + · x2 +
|
[f(x1, x2, x3)] |
= |
· x1 + · x2 + · x3 +
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
g(x,y) |
→ |
x |
(1) |
g(x,y) |
→ |
y |
(2) |
1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over (4 x 4)-matrices with strict dimension 1
over the naturals
[s(x1)] |
= |
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
· x1 +
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
[f(x1, x2, x3)] |
= |
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
· x1 +
|
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
· x2 +
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
· x3 +
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
f(s(x),y,y) |
→ |
f(y,x,s(x)) |
(3) |
1.1.1 R is empty
There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.