Certification Problem

Input (TPDB TRS_Standard/SK90/2.35)

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

and(x,false) false (1)
and(x,not(false)) x (2)
not(not(x)) x (3)
implies(false,y) not(false) (4)
implies(x,false) not(x) (5)
implies(not(x),not(y)) implies(y,and(x,y)) (6)

Property / Task

Prove or disprove termination.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by ttt2 @ termCOMP 2023)

1 Rule Removal

Using the linear polynomial interpretation over (3 x 3)-matrices with strict dimension 1 over the naturals
[and(x1, x2)] =
1 0 0
0 1 0
1 1 1
· x1 +
1 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
· x2 +
1 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
[implies(x1, x2)] =
1 1 1
0 1 0
1 1 1
· x1 +
1 0 1
0 1 0
0 0 1
· x2 +
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0
[false] =
1 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
[not(x1)] =
1 0 1
0 1 0
1 1 1
· x1 +
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0
all of the following rules can be deleted.
and(x,false) false (1)
and(x,not(false)) x (2)
implies(x,false) not(x) (5)

1.1 Rule Removal

Using the linear polynomial interpretation over (3 x 3)-matrices with strict dimension 1 over the naturals
[and(x1, x2)] =
1 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 1
· x1 +
1 0 0
1 0 1
0 1 0
· x2 +
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
[implies(x1, x2)] =
1 0 1
0 0 1
0 0 1
· x1 +
1 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 1
· x2 +
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
[false] =
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 0
[not(x1)] =
1 1 0
0 0 1
1 1 1
· x1 +
1 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
all of the following rules can be deleted.
not(not(x)) x (3)
implies(not(x),not(y)) implies(y,and(x,y)) (6)

1.1.1 Rule Removal

Using the Weighted Path Order with the following precedence and status
prec(implies) = 1 status(implies) = [1, 2] list-extension(implies) = Lex
prec(not) = 0 status(not) = [1] list-extension(not) = Lex
prec(false) = 0 status(false) = [] list-extension(false) = Lex
and the following Max-polynomial interpretation
[implies(x1, x2)] = max(4, 0 + 1 · x1, 0 + 1 · x2)
[not(x1)] = max(0, 0 + 1 · x1)
[false] = max(4)
all of the following rules can be deleted.
implies(false,y) not(false) (4)

1.1.1.1 R is empty

There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.