Certification Problem

Input (TPDB TRS_Standard/SK90/4.09)

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

+(x,0) x (1)
+(x,i(x)) 0 (2)
+(+(x,y),z) +(x,+(y,z)) (3)
*(x,+(y,z)) +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) (4)
*(+(x,y),z) +(*(x,z),*(y,z)) (5)

Property / Task

Prove or disprove termination.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by ttt2 @ termCOMP 2023)

1 Rule Removal

Using the Weighted Path Order with the following precedence and status
prec(*) = 1 status(*) = [1, 2] list-extension(*) = Lex
prec(i) = 0 status(i) = [1] list-extension(i) = Lex
prec(+) = 0 status(+) = [1, 2] list-extension(+) = Lex
prec(0) = 0 status(0) = [] list-extension(0) = Lex
and the following Max-polynomial interpretation
[*(x1, x2)] = max(0, 0 + 1 · x1, 0 + 1 · x2)
[i(x1)] = max(0, 5 + 1 · x1)
[+(x1, x2)] = max(0, 0 + 1 · x1, 0 + 1 · x2)
[0] = max(3)
all of the following rules can be deleted.
+(x,0) x (1)
+(x,i(x)) 0 (2)
+(+(x,y),z) +(x,+(y,z)) (3)
*(x,+(y,z)) +(*(x,y),*(x,z)) (4)
*(+(x,y),z) +(*(x,z),*(y,z)) (5)

1.1 R is empty

There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.