Certification Problem

Input (TPDB TRS_Standard/Transformed_CSR_04/PALINDROME_nosorts-noand_FR)

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

__(__(X,Y),Z) __(X,__(Y,Z)) (1)
__(X,nil) X (2)
__(nil,X) X (3)
U11(tt) U12(tt) (4)
U12(tt) tt (5)
isNePal(__(I,__(P,I))) U11(tt) (6)
activate(X) X (7)

Property / Task

Prove or disprove termination.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by ttt2 @ termCOMP 2023)

1 Rule Removal

Using the Knuth Bendix order with w0 = 1 and the following precedence and weight functions
prec(activate) = 7 weight(activate) = 2
prec(isNePal) = 2 weight(isNePal) = 4
prec(U12) = 0 weight(U12) = 1
prec(U11) = 1 weight(U11) = 1
prec(tt) = 3 weight(tt) = 6
prec(nil) = 4 weight(nil) = 4
prec(__) = 6 weight(__) = 0
all of the following rules can be deleted.
__(__(X,Y),Z) __(X,__(Y,Z)) (1)
__(X,nil) X (2)
__(nil,X) X (3)
U11(tt) U12(tt) (4)
U12(tt) tt (5)
isNePal(__(I,__(P,I))) U11(tt) (6)
activate(X) X (7)

1.1 R is empty

There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.