LTS Termination Proof

by T2Cert

Input

Integer Transition System

Proof

1 Invariant Updates

The following invariants are asserted.

0: TRUE
1: 1 − arg1P ≤ 0arg2P ≤ 0arg3P ≤ 01 − arg1 ≤ 0arg2 ≤ 0arg3 ≤ 0
2: TRUE

The invariants are proved as follows.

IMPACT Invariant Proof

2 Switch to Cooperation Termination Proof

We consider the following cutpoint-transitions:
1 8 1: arg8P + arg8P ≤ 0arg8Parg8P ≤ 0arg8 + arg8 ≤ 0arg8arg8 ≤ 0arg7P + arg7P ≤ 0arg7Parg7P ≤ 0arg7 + arg7 ≤ 0arg7arg7 ≤ 0arg6P + arg6P ≤ 0arg6Parg6P ≤ 0arg6 + arg6 ≤ 0arg6arg6 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0
and for every transition t, a duplicate t is considered.

3 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 0, 1, 2, 3, 7 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −11.

2: 0
0: 0
1: 0
2: −4
0: −5
1: −6
1_var_snapshot: −6
1*: −6

4 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

1* 11 1: arg8P + arg8P ≤ 0arg8Parg8P ≤ 0arg8 + arg8 ≤ 0arg8arg8 ≤ 0arg7P + arg7P ≤ 0arg7Parg7P ≤ 0arg7 + arg7 ≤ 0arg7arg7 ≤ 0arg6P + arg6P ≤ 0arg6Parg6P ≤ 0arg6 + arg6 ≤ 0arg6arg6 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0

5 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

1 9 1_var_snapshot: arg8P + arg8P ≤ 0arg8Parg8P ≤ 0arg8 + arg8 ≤ 0arg8arg8 ≤ 0arg7P + arg7P ≤ 0arg7Parg7P ≤ 0arg7 + arg7 ≤ 0arg7arg7 ≤ 0arg6P + arg6P ≤ 0arg6Parg6P ≤ 0arg6 + arg6 ≤ 0arg6arg6 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0

6 SCC Decomposition

We consider subproblems for each of the 1 SCC(s) of the program graph.

6.1 SCC Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider the SCC { 1, 1_var_snapshot, 1* }.

6.1.1 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 5, 6 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 3.

1: 2⋅arg6 − 4⋅arg7 + 2⋅arg8
1_var_snapshot: 2⋅arg6 − 4⋅arg7 + 2⋅arg8
1*: 2⋅arg6 − 4⋅arg7 + 2⋅arg8

6.1.2 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 9, 11, 4 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −1.

1: 1 + 6⋅arg2
1_var_snapshot: 6⋅arg2
1*: 2 + 6⋅arg2

6.1.3 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

We consider 1 subproblems corresponding to sets of cut-point transitions as follows.

6.1.3.1 Cut-Point Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider cut-point transition 8.

6.1.3.1.1 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.

Tool configuration

T2Cert