3.16/1.67	MAYBE
3.16/1.67	
3.16/1.67	Proof:
3.16/1.67	ConCon could not decide confluence of the system.
3.16/1.67	\cite{ALS94}, Theorem 4.1 does not apply.
3.16/1.67	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
3.16/1.67	This system is strongly deterministic.
3.16/1.67	This system is quasi-decreasing.
3.16/1.67	By \cite{O02}, p. 214, Proposition 7.2.50.
3.16/1.67	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
3.16/1.67	This system is deterministic.
3.16/1.67	System R transformed to U(R).
3.16/1.67	This system is terminating.
3.16/1.67	Call external tool:
3.16/1.67	./ttt2.sh
3.16/1.67	Input:
3.16/1.67	(VAR x)
3.16/1.67	(RULES
3.16/1.67	  a -> c
3.16/1.67	  a -> d
3.16/1.67	  ?1(c, x) -> x
3.16/1.67	  f(x) -> ?1(x, x)
3.16/1.67	)
3.16/1.67	
3.16/1.67	 Polynomial Interpretation Processor:
3.16/1.67	  dimension: 1
3.16/1.67	  interpretation:
3.16/1.67	   [f](x0) = 6x0x0 + 5,
3.16/1.67	   
3.16/1.67	   [?1](x0, x1) = -4x0 + x1 + 6x0x0 + 4,
3.16/1.67	   
3.16/1.67	   [d] = 0,
3.16/1.67	   
3.16/1.67	   [c] = 0,
3.16/1.67	   
3.16/1.67	   [a] = 1
3.16/1.67	  orientation:
3.16/1.67	   a() = 1 >= 0 = c()
3.16/1.67	   
3.16/1.67	   a() = 1 >= 0 = d()
3.16/1.67	   
3.16/1.67	   ?1(c(),x) = x + 4 >= x = x
3.16/1.67	   
3.16/1.67	   f(x) = 6x*x + 5 >= -3x + 6x*x + 4 = ?1(x,x)
3.16/1.67	  problem:
3.16/1.67	   
3.16/1.67	  Qed
3.16/1.67	ConCon could not decide whether all 2 critical pairs are joinable or not.
3.16/1.67	Overlap: (rule1: a -> d, rule2: a -> c, pos: ε, mgu: {})
3.16/1.67	CP: c = d
3.16/1.67	ConCon could not decide context-joinability of this critical pair.
3.16/1.67	
3.24/1.70	EOF