3.22/1.75 MAYBE 3.22/1.75 3.22/1.75 Proof: 3.22/1.75 ConCon could not decide confluence of the system. 3.22/1.75 \cite{ALS94}, Theorem 4.1 does not apply. 3.22/1.75 This system is of type 3 or smaller. 3.22/1.75 This system is strongly deterministic. 3.22/1.75 This system is quasi-decreasing. 3.22/1.75 By \cite{A14}, Theorem 11.5.9. 3.22/1.75 This system is of type 3 or smaller. 3.22/1.75 This system is deterministic. 3.22/1.75 System R transformed to V(R) + Emb. 3.22/1.75 This system is terminating. 3.22/1.75 Call external tool: 3.22/1.75 ./ttt2.sh 3.22/1.75 Input: 3.22/1.75 (VAR x y) 3.22/1.75 (RULES 3.22/1.75 a -> c 3.22/1.75 a -> d 3.22/1.75 b -> c 3.22/1.75 b -> d 3.22/1.75 g(x, x) -> h(x, x) 3.22/1.75 f(x) -> x 3.22/1.75 h(x, y) -> x 3.22/1.75 h(x, y) -> y 3.22/1.75 g(x, y) -> x 3.22/1.75 g(x, y) -> y 3.22/1.75 f(x) -> x 3.22/1.75 ) 3.22/1.75 3.22/1.75 Polynomial Interpretation Processor: 3.22/1.75 dimension: 1 3.22/1.75 interpretation: 3.22/1.75 [f](x0) = 2x0 + 2, 3.22/1.75 3.22/1.75 [h](x0, x1) = x0 + 4x1 + 1, 3.22/1.75 3.22/1.75 [g](x0, x1) = 4x0 + x1 + x1x1 + 5, 3.22/1.75 3.22/1.75 [b] = 1, 3.22/1.75 3.22/1.75 [d] = 0, 3.22/1.75 3.22/1.75 [c] = 0, 3.22/1.75 3.22/1.75 [a] = 4 3.40/1.75 orientation: 3.40/1.75 a() = 4 >= 0 = c() 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 a() = 4 >= 0 = d() 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 b() = 1 >= 0 = c() 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 b() = 1 >= 0 = d() 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 g(x,x) = 5x + x*x + 5 >= 5x + 1 = h(x,x) 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 f(x) = 2x + 2 >= x = x 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 h(x,y) = x + 4y + 1 >= x = x 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 h(x,y) = x + 4y + 1 >= y = y 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 g(x,y) = 4x + y + y*y + 5 >= x = x 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 g(x,y) = 4x + y + y*y + 5 >= y = y 3.40/1.75 problem: 3.40/1.75 3.40/1.75 Qed 3.40/1.75 ConCon could not decide whether all 4 critical pairs are joinable or not. 3.40/1.75 Overlap: (rule1: a -> d, rule2: a -> c, pos: ε, mgu: {}) 3.40/1.75 CP: c = d 3.40/1.75 ConCon could not decide context-joinability of this critical pair. 3.40/1.75 3.41/1.78 EOF