3.65/1.84	MAYBE
3.65/1.84	
3.65/1.84	Proof:
3.65/1.85	ConCon could not decide confluence of the system.
3.65/1.85	\cite{ALS94}, Theorem 4.1 does not apply.
3.65/1.85	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
3.65/1.85	This system is strongly deterministic.
3.65/1.85	This system is quasi-decreasing.
3.65/1.85	By \cite{A14}, Theorem 11.5.9.
3.65/1.85	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
3.65/1.85	This system is deterministic.
3.65/1.85	System R transformed to V(R) + Emb.
3.65/1.85	This system is terminating.
3.65/1.85	Call external tool:
3.65/1.85	./ttt2.sh
3.65/1.85	Input:
3.65/1.85	(VAR x)
3.65/1.85	(RULES
3.65/1.85	  f(x) -> x
3.65/1.85	  f(x) -> s(x)
3.65/1.85	  s(a) -> t(b)
3.65/1.85	  a -> b
3.65/1.85	  s(x) -> x
3.65/1.85	  t(x) -> x
3.65/1.85	  f(x) -> x
3.65/1.85	)
3.65/1.85	
3.65/1.85	 Polynomial Interpretation Processor:
3.65/1.85	  dimension: 1
3.65/1.85	  interpretation:
3.65/1.85	   [t](x0) = x0 + 4,
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   [b] = 4,
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   [a] = 7,
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   [s](x0) = x0 + 2,
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   [f](x0) = x0 + 4
3.65/1.85	  orientation:
3.65/1.85	   f(x) = x + 4 >= x = x
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   f(x) = x + 4 >= x + 2 = s(x)
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   s(a()) = 9 >= 8 = t(b())
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   a() = 7 >= 4 = b()
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   s(x) = x + 2 >= x = x
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	   t(x) = x + 4 >= x = x
3.65/1.85	  problem:
3.65/1.85	   
3.65/1.85	  Qed
3.65/1.85	ConCon could not decide whether all 1 critical pairs are joinable or not.
3.65/1.85	Overlap: (rule1: s(a) -> t(b), rule2: a -> b, pos: 1, mgu: {})
3.65/1.85	CP: s(b) = t(b)
3.65/1.85	ConCon could not decide context-joinability of this critical pair.
3.65/1.85	
3.65/1.88	EOF