3.16/1.71	MAYBE
3.16/1.71	
3.16/1.71	Proof:
3.16/1.71	ConCon could not decide confluence of the system.
3.16/1.71	\cite{ALS94}, Theorem 4.1 does not apply.
3.16/1.71	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
3.16/1.71	This system is strongly deterministic.
3.16/1.71	This system is quasi-decreasing.
3.16/1.71	By \cite{O02}, p. 214, Proposition 7.2.50.
3.16/1.71	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
3.16/1.71	This system is deterministic.
3.16/1.71	System R transformed to optimized U(R).
3.16/1.72	This system is terminating.
3.16/1.72	Call external tool:
3.16/1.72	./ttt2.sh
3.16/1.72	Input:
3.16/1.72	(VAR x)
3.16/1.72	(RULES
3.16/1.72	  a -> c
3.16/1.72	  a -> d
3.16/1.72	  f(x) -> ?1(x, x)
3.16/1.72	  ?1(c, x) -> x
3.16/1.72	)
3.16/1.72	
3.16/1.72	 Polynomial Interpretation Processor:
3.16/1.72	  dimension: 1
3.16/1.72	  interpretation:
3.16/1.72	   [?1](x0, x1) = -2x0 + x1 + 4x0x0 + 4,
3.16/1.72	   
3.16/1.72	   [f](x0) = 4x0 + 4x0x0 + 5,
3.16/1.72	   
3.16/1.72	   [d] = 0,
3.16/1.72	   
3.16/1.72	   [c] = 0,
3.16/1.72	   
3.16/1.72	   [a] = 1
3.16/1.72	  orientation:
3.16/1.72	   a() = 1 >= 0 = c()
3.16/1.72	   
3.16/1.72	   a() = 1 >= 0 = d()
3.16/1.72	   
3.16/1.72	   f(x) = 4x + 4x*x + 5 >= -1x + 4x*x + 4 = ?1(x,x)
3.16/1.72	   
3.16/1.72	   ?1(c(),x) = x + 4 >= x = x
3.16/1.72	  problem:
3.16/1.72	   
3.16/1.72	  Qed
3.16/1.72	ConCon could not decide whether all 2 critical pairs are joinable or not.
3.16/1.72	Overlap: (rule1: a -> d, rule2: a -> c, pos: ε, mgu: {})
3.16/1.72	CP: c = d
3.16/1.72	ConCon could not decide context-joinability of this critical pair.
3.16/1.72	
3.16/1.74	EOF