2.69/1.64	YES
2.69/1.64	<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="cpfHTML.xsl"?>
2.69/1.64	<certificationProblem>
2.69/1.64	 <input>
2.69/1.64	  <ctrsInput>
2.69/1.64	   <conditionalRules>
2.69/1.64	    <conditionalRule>
2.69/1.64	     <rule>
2.69/1.64	      <lhs>
2.69/1.64	       <funapp>
2.69/1.64	        <name>a</name>
2.69/1.64	       </funapp>
2.69/1.64	      </lhs>
2.69/1.64	      <rhs>
2.69/1.64	       <funapp>
2.69/1.64	        <name>b</name>
2.69/1.64	       </funapp>
2.69/1.64	      </rhs>
2.69/1.64	     </rule>
2.69/1.64	     <rule>
2.69/1.64	      <lhs>
2.69/1.64	       <funapp>
2.69/1.64	        <name>a</name>
2.69/1.64	       </funapp>
2.69/1.64	      </lhs>
2.69/1.64	      <rhs>
2.69/1.64	       <funapp>
2.69/1.64	        <name>b</name>
2.69/1.64	       </funapp>
2.69/1.64	      </rhs>
2.69/1.64	     </rule>
2.69/1.64	    </conditionalRule>
2.69/1.64	   </conditionalRules>
2.69/1.64	  </ctrsInput>
2.69/1.64	 </input>
2.69/1.64	 <cpfVersion>2.4</cpfVersion>
2.69/1.64	 <proof>
2.69/1.64	  <conditionalCrProof>
2.69/1.64	   <almostOrthogonal/>
2.69/1.64	  </conditionalCrProof>
2.69/1.64	 </proof>
2.69/1.64	 <origin>
2.69/1.64	  <proofOrigin>
2.69/1.64	   <tool>
2.69/1.64	    <name>ConCon</name>
2.69/1.64	    <version>concon 1.4.0.0</version>
2.69/1.64	    <strategy>concon -s --cert --no-inlining theBenchmark.trs 58</strategy>
2.69/1.64	   </tool>
2.69/1.64	  </proofOrigin>
2.69/1.64	 </origin>
2.69/1.64	</certificationProblem>
2.69/1.64	EOF