2.74/1.26	MAYBE
2.74/1.26	
2.74/1.26	Proof:
2.74/1.26	ConCon could not decide confluence of the system.
2.74/1.26	\cite{ALS94}, Theorem 4.1 does not apply.
2.74/1.26	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
2.74/1.26	This system is strongly deterministic.
2.74/1.26	This system is quasi-decreasing.
2.74/1.26	By \cite{A14}, Theorem 11.5.9.
2.74/1.26	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
2.74/1.26	This system is deterministic.
2.74/1.26	System R transformed to V(R) + Emb.
2.74/1.26	This system is terminating.
2.74/1.26	Call external tool:
2.74/1.26	./ttt2.sh
2.74/1.26	Input:
2.74/1.26	  f(x) -> x
2.74/1.26	  f(x) -> s(x)
2.74/1.26	  s(a) -> t(b)
2.74/1.26	  a -> b
2.74/1.26	  s(x) -> x
2.74/1.26	  t(x) -> x
2.74/1.26	  f(x) -> x
2.74/1.26	
2.74/1.26	 Polynomial Interpretation Processor:
2.74/1.26	  dimension: 1
2.74/1.26	  interpretation:
2.74/1.26	   [t](x0) = x0 + 4,
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   [b] = 4,
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   [a] = 7,
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   [s](x0) = x0 + 2,
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   [f](x0) = x0 + 4
2.74/1.26	  orientation:
2.74/1.26	   f(x) = x + 4 >= x = x
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   f(x) = x + 4 >= x + 2 = s(x)
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   s(a()) = 9 >= 8 = t(b())
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   a() = 7 >= 4 = b()
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   s(x) = x + 2 >= x = x
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	   t(x) = x + 4 >= x = x
2.74/1.26	  problem:
2.74/1.26	   
2.74/1.26	  Qed
2.74/1.26	This critical pair is not unfeasible.
2.74/1.26	ConCon could not decide whether all 1 critical pairs are joinable or not.
2.74/1.26	Overlap: (rule1: s(a) -> t(b), rule2: a -> b, pos: 1, mgu: {})
2.74/1.26	CP: s(b) = t(b)
2.74/1.26	This critical pair is not unfeasible.
2.74/1.26	
2.74/1.28	EOF