2.39/1.20	MAYBE
2.39/1.20	
2.39/1.20	Proof:
2.39/1.20	ConCon could not decide confluence of the system.
2.39/1.20	\cite{ALS94}, Theorem 4.1 does not apply.
2.44/1.20	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
2.44/1.20	This system is strongly deterministic.
2.44/1.20	This system is quasi-decreasing.
2.44/1.20	By \cite{O02}, p. 214, Proposition 7.2.50.
2.44/1.20	This system is of type 3 or smaller.
2.44/1.20	This system is deterministic.
2.44/1.20	System R transformed to U(R).
2.44/1.20	This system is terminating.
2.44/1.20	Call external tool:
2.44/1.20	./ttt2.sh
2.44/1.20	Input:
2.44/1.20	  a -> c
2.44/1.20	  a -> d
2.44/1.20	  b -> c
2.44/1.20	  b -> d
2.44/1.20	  g(x, x) -> h(x, x)
2.44/1.20	  ?1(c, x) -> x
2.44/1.20	  f(x) -> ?1(x, x)
2.44/1.20	
2.44/1.20	 Polynomial Interpretation Processor:
2.44/1.20	  dimension: 1
2.44/1.20	  interpretation:
2.44/1.21	   [f](x0) = x0 + 4x0x0 + 2,
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   [?1](x0, x1) = x1 + 4x0x0 + 1,
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   [h](x0, x1) = 2x0 + -4x1 + x0x0 + 5x1x1,
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   [g](x0, x1) = 2x0 + 2x1 + 6x1x1 + 1,
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   [b] = 1,
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   [d] = 0,
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   [c] = 0,
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   [a] = 1
2.44/1.21	  orientation:
2.44/1.21	   a() = 1 >= 0 = c()
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   a() = 1 >= 0 = d()
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   b() = 1 >= 0 = c()
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   b() = 1 >= 0 = d()
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   g(x,x) = 4x + 6x*x + 1 >= -2x + 6x*x = h(x,x)
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   ?1(c(),x) = x + 1 >= x = x
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	   f(x) = x + 4x*x + 2 >= x + 4x*x + 1 = ?1(x,x)
2.44/1.21	  problem:
2.44/1.21	   
2.44/1.21	  Qed
2.44/1.21	This critical pair is not unfeasible.
2.44/1.21	ConCon could not decide whether all 4 critical pairs are joinable or not.
2.44/1.21	Overlap: (rule1: a -> d, rule2: a -> c, pos: ε, mgu: {})
2.44/1.21	CP: c = d
2.44/1.21	This critical pair is not unfeasible.
2.44/1.21	
2.46/1.23	EOF