YES

Succeeded in reading "/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.ari".
    (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
    (VAR y xs ys x x4 x3)
    (RULES
      isnoc(cons(y,nil)) -> tp2(nil,y)
      isnoc(cons(x,ys)) -> tp2(cons(x,xs),y) | isnoc(ys) == tp2(xs,y)
    )

No "->="-rules.

Decomposed conditions and removed infeasible rules if possible.
    (CONDITIONTYPE ORIENTED)
    (VAR y xs ys x x4 x3)
    (RULES
      isnoc(cons(y,nil)) -> tp2(nil,y)
      isnoc(cons(x,ys)) -> tp2(cons(x,xs),y) | isnoc(ys) == tp2(xs,y)
    )

(VAR x4 x3)
(CONDITION 
isnoc(nil) == tp2(x3,x4)
)

Optimized the infeasibility problem if possible.

(VAR x4 x3)
(CONDITION 
isnoc(nil) == tp2(x3,x4)
)

This is ultra-RL and deterministic.

This is not operationally terminating and confluent.

This is a constructor-based system.

(RTG_of_NARROWINGTREE
(START
  Gamma[isnoc(nil) == tp2(x3,x4) : { e, 1, 1.1 }]
)
(NONTERMINALS
  Gamma[isnoc(nil) == tp2(x3,x4) : { e, 1, 1.1 }]
)
(RULES
  Gamma[isnoc(nil) == tp2(x3,x4) : { e, 1, 1.1 }] -> EmptySet
)
)

YES