Certification Problem
Input (COPS 88)
We consider the TRS containing the following rules:
p
(
x
)
→
q
(
x
)
(1)
p
(
x
)
→
r
(
x
)
(2)
q
(
x
)
→
s
(
p
(
x
))
(3)
r
(
x
)
→
s
(
p
(
x
))
(4)
s
(
x
)
→
f
(
p
(
x
))
(5)
The underlying signature is as follows:
{
p
/1,
q
/1,
r
/1,
s
/1,
f
/1}
Property / Task
Prove or disprove confluence.
Answer / Result
Yes.
Proof (by ACP @ CoCo 2020)
1 Strongly closed
Confluence is proven since the TRS is strongly closed. The joins can be performed using 2 step(s).