We consider the TRS containing the following rules:
| a | → | f(f(h(a,c))) | (1) |
| h(h(h(c,f(h(f(h(h(c,c),c)),b))),h(h(a,c),h(f(a),h(f(f(c)),h(c,b))))),h(f(a),c)) | → | c | (2) |
The underlying signature is as follows:
{a/0, f/1, h/2, c/0, b/0}| t0 | = | h(h(h(c,f(h(f(h(h(c,c),c)),b))),h(h(a,c),h(f(a),h(f(f(c)),h(c,b))))),h(f(a),c)) |
| → | h(h(h(c,f(h(f(h(h(c,c),c)),b))),h(h(f(f(h(a,c))),c),h(f(a),h(f(f(c)),h(c,b))))),h(f(a),c)) | |
| = | t1 |
| t0 | = | h(h(h(c,f(h(f(h(h(c,c),c)),b))),h(h(a,c),h(f(a),h(f(f(c)),h(c,b))))),h(f(a),c)) |
| → | c | |
| = | t1 |
Automaton 1
final states:
{72}
transitions:
| h(104,103) | → | 105 |
| h(92,87) | → | 93 |
| h(82,79) | → | 83 |
| h(85,83) | → | 86 |
| h(78,77) | → | 79 |
| h(98,97) | → | 99 |
| h(105,94) | → | 106 |
| h(93,86) | → | 94 |
| h(99,96) | → | 100 |
| h(106,76) | → | 72 |
| h(75,73) | → | 76 |
| h(89,88) | → | 90 |
| h(101,95) | → | 102 |
| b | → | 77 |
| b | → | 95 |
| c | → | 73 |
| c | → | 78 |
| c | → | 80 |
| c | → | 87 |
| c | → | 88 |
| c | → | 96 |
| c | → | 97 |
| c | → | 98 |
| c | → | 104 |
| a | → | 74 |
| a | → | 84 |
| a | → | 89 |
| f(90) | → | 91 |
| f(91) | → | 92 |
| f(91) | → | 84 |
| f(91) | → | 74 |
| f(91) | → | 89 |
| f(102) | → | 103 |
| f(84) | → | 85 |
| f(80) | → | 81 |
| f(100) | → | 101 |
| f(81) | → | 82 |
| f(74) | → | 75 |
Automaton 2
final states:
{36}
transitions:
| c | → | 36 |