The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a__f(f(X)) | → | a__c(f(g(f(X)))) | (1) |
a__c(X) | → | d(X) | (2) |
a__h(X) | → | a__c(d(X)) | (3) |
mark(f(X)) | → | a__f(mark(X)) | (4) |
mark(c(X)) | → | a__c(X) | (5) |
mark(h(X)) | → | a__h(mark(X)) | (6) |
mark(g(X)) | → | g(X) | (7) |
mark(d(X)) | → | d(X) | (8) |
a__f(X) | → | f(X) | (9) |
a__c(X) | → | c(X) | (10) |
a__h(X) | → | h(X) | (11) |
final states:
{1, 2}
transitions:
a__f0(2) | → | 1 |
a__c0(2) | → | 1 |
a__h0(2) | → | 1 |
mark0(2) | → | 1 |
f1(2) | → | 1 |
d1(2) | → | 1 |
c1(2) | → | 1 |
h1(2) | → | 1 |
a__c1(2) | → | 1 |
g1(2) | → | 1 |
d2(2) | → | 1 |
c2(2) | → | 1 |
a__c1(3) | → | 1 |
d2(3) | → | 1 |
c2(3) | → | 1 |
a__c1(6) | → | 1 |
d2(6) | → | 1 |
c2(6) | → | 1 |
a__f1(7) | → | 1 |
f2(7) | → | 1 |
a__h1(8) | → | 1 |
h2(8) | → | 1 |
a__c2(9) | → | 1 |
d3(9) | → | 1 |
c3(9) | → | 1 |
a__c2(10) | → | 1 |
d3(10) | → | 1 |
c3(10) | → | 1 |
f0(2) | → | 2 |
g0(2) | → | 2 |
d0(2) | → | 2 |
c0(2) | → | 2 |
h0(2) | → | 2 |
f1(4) | → | 3 |
g1(5) | → | 4 |
f1(2) | → | 5 |
d1(2) | → | 6 |
mark1(2) | → | 7 |
a__c1(2) | → | 7 |
g1(2) | → | 7 |
d1(2) | → | 7 |
d2(2) | → | 7 |
c2(2) | → | 7 |
a__f1(7) | → | 7 |
f2(7) | → | 7 |
a__h1(8) | → | 7 |
h2(8) | → | 7 |
a__c2(9) | → | 7 |
d3(9) | → | 7 |
c3(9) | → | 7 |
a__c2(10) | → | 7 |
d3(10) | → | 7 |
c3(10) | → | 7 |
mark1(2) | → | 8 |
a__c1(2) | → | 8 |
g1(2) | → | 8 |
d1(2) | → | 8 |
d2(2) | → | 8 |
c2(2) | → | 8 |
a__f1(7) | → | 8 |
f2(7) | → | 8 |
a__h1(8) | → | 8 |
h2(8) | → | 8 |
a__c2(9) | → | 8 |
d3(9) | → | 8 |
c3(9) | → | 8 |
a__c2(10) | → | 8 |
d3(10) | → | 8 |
c3(10) | → | 8 |
d2(8) | → | 9 |
f2(11) | → | 10 |
g2(12) | → | 11 |
f2(7) | → | 12 |