The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
The dependency pairs are split into 4
components.
-
The
1st
component contains the
pair
|
$#(#(x1)) |
→ |
$#(*(x1)) |
(19) |
1.1.1.1.1 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [*(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [0(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [1(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [#(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [$#(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
together with the usable
rules
|
*(0(x1)) |
→ |
1(*(x1)) |
(8) |
|
*(1(x1)) |
→ |
#(0(x1)) |
(9) |
|
0(#(x1)) |
→ |
#(0(x1)) |
(10) |
|
1(#(x1)) |
→ |
#(1(x1)) |
(11) |
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair),
the
rule
could be deleted.
1.1.1.1.1.1 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [*(x1)] |
= |
2 · x1
|
| [0(x1)] |
= |
1 + 3 · x1
|
| [1(x1)] |
= |
2 + 3 · x1
|
| [#(x1)] |
= |
1 + 2 · x1
|
| [$#(x1)] |
= |
3 · x1
|
the
pair
|
$#(#(x1)) |
→ |
$#(*(x1)) |
(19) |
and
the
rules
|
*(1(x1)) |
→ |
#(0(x1)) |
(9) |
|
0(#(x1)) |
→ |
#(0(x1)) |
(10) |
could be deleted.
1.1.1.1.1.1.1 P is empty
There are no pairs anymore.
-
The
2nd
component contains the
pair
1.1.1.1.2 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [0(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [*#(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
rule
could be deleted.
1.1.1.1.2.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
*#(0(x1)) |
→ |
*#(x1) |
(15) |
|
| 1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
3rd
component contains the
pair
1.1.1.1.3 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [#(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [0#(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
rule
could be deleted.
1.1.1.1.3.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
0#(#(x1)) |
→ |
0#(x1) |
(17) |
|
| 1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
4th
component contains the
pair
1.1.1.1.4 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [#(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [1#(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
rule
could be deleted.
1.1.1.1.4.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
1#(#(x1)) |
→ |
1#(x1) |
(18) |
|
| 1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.