The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
| b(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | a(b(c(b(b(c(a(x1))))))) | (1) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(b(c(a(x1)))) | (2) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(a(x1))) | (3) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(b(b(c(a(x1)))))) | (4) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(b(b(c(a(x1)))))) | (4) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(a(x1))) | (3) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(b(c(a(x1)))) | (2) |
| [a(x1)] | = | 2438 |
| [b(x1)] | = | 2438 |
| [c(x1)] | = | x1 + 1 |
| [b#(x1)] | = | x1 + 0 |
| b(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | a(b(c(b(b(c(a(x1))))))) | (1) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(b(c(a(x1)))) | (2) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(a(x1))) | (3) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(b(b(c(a(x1)))))) | (4) |
| [a(x1)] | = | x1 + 0 |
| [b(x1)] | = | x1 + 8366 |
| [c(x1)] | = | x1 + 0 |
| [b#(x1)] | = | x1 + 0 |
| b(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | a(b(c(b(b(c(a(x1))))))) | (1) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(a(x1))) | (3) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(b(b(c(a(x1)))))) | (4) |
| [a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [c(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [b#(x1)] | = |
|
| b(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | a(b(c(b(b(c(a(x1))))))) | (1) |
| b#(c(a(b(b(c(x1)))))) | → | b#(c(b(b(c(a(x1)))))) | (4) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.