The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(c(x1)) | → | a(x1) | (1) |
a(c(b(c(x1)))) | → | c(b(c(c(x1)))) | (2) |
c(x1) | → | b(a(a(x1))) | (3) |
c(a(x1)) | → | a(x1) | (4) |
c(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c(c(b(c(x1)))) | (5) |
c(x1) | → | a(a(b(x1))) | (6) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (7) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(c(b(c(x1)))) | (8) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (7) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(c(b(c(x1)))) | (8) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (9) |
[c(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
[c#(x1)] | = |
|
c(a(x1)) | → | a(x1) | (4) |
c(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c(c(b(c(x1)))) | (5) |
c(x1) | → | a(a(b(x1))) | (6) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(c(b(c(x1)))) | (8) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (7) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (9) |
[c(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[c#(x1)] | = |
|
c(a(x1)) | → | a(x1) | (4) |
c(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c(c(b(c(x1)))) | (5) |
c(x1) | → | a(a(b(x1))) | (6) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (7) |
c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.