The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
| a(c(x1)) | → | a(x1) | (1) |
| a(c(b(c(x1)))) | → | c(b(c(c(x1)))) | (2) |
| c(x1) | → | b(a(a(x1))) | (3) |
| c(a(x1)) | → | a(x1) | (4) |
| c(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c(c(b(c(x1)))) | (5) |
| c(x1) | → | a(a(b(x1))) | (6) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (7) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(c(b(c(x1)))) | (8) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (7) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(c(b(c(x1)))) | (8) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (9) |
| [c(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||
| [c#(x1)] | = |
|
| c(a(x1)) | → | a(x1) | (4) |
| c(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c(c(b(c(x1)))) | (5) |
| c(x1) | → | a(a(b(x1))) | (6) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(c(b(c(x1)))) | (8) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (7) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (9) |
| [c(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [b(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [a(x1)] | = |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [c#(x1)] | = |
|
| c(a(x1)) | → | a(x1) | (4) |
| c(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c(c(b(c(x1)))) | (5) |
| c(x1) | → | a(a(b(x1))) | (6) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(x1) | (7) |
| c#(b(c(a(x1)))) | → | c#(b(c(x1))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.