Certification Problem
Input (TPDB SRS_Standard/Secret_06_SRS/aprove00)
The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a(s(x1)) |
→ |
s(s(s(p(s(b(p(p(s(s(x1)))))))))) |
(1) |
b(s(x1)) |
→ |
s(s(s(p(p(s(s(c(p(s(p(s(x1)))))))))))) |
(2) |
c(s(x1)) |
→ |
p(s(p(s(a(p(s(p(s(x1))))))))) |
(3) |
p(p(s(x1))) |
→ |
p(x1) |
(4) |
p(s(x1)) |
→ |
x1 |
(5) |
Property / Task
Prove or disprove termination.Answer / Result
Yes.Proof (by matchbox @ termCOMP 2023)
1 Dependency Pair Transformation
The following set of initial dependency pairs has been identified.
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
a#(p(s(p(s(x1))))) |
(6) |
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(x1)) |
(7) |
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(a(p(s(p(s(x1))))))) |
(8) |
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(p(s(x1)))) |
(9) |
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(p(s(a(p(s(p(s(x1))))))))) |
(10) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
c#(p(s(p(s(x1))))) |
(11) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(x1)) |
(12) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(s(c(p(s(p(s(x1)))))))) |
(13) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(p(s(x1)))) |
(14) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(p(s(s(c(p(s(p(s(x1))))))))) |
(15) |
a#(s(x1)) |
→ |
b#(p(p(s(s(x1))))) |
(16) |
a#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(b(p(p(s(s(x1))))))) |
(17) |
a#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(s(x1))) |
(18) |
a#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(p(s(s(x1)))) |
(19) |
p#(p(s(x1))) |
→ |
p#(x1) |
(20) |
1.1 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the matrix interpretations of dimension 1 with strict dimension 1 over the rationals with delta = 1
[c(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
[b(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
[a(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
[s(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
[p(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
[c#(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
[b#(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
[a#(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
[p#(x1)] |
= |
x1 +
|
together with the usable
rules
a(s(x1)) |
→ |
s(s(s(p(s(b(p(p(s(s(x1)))))))))) |
(1) |
b(s(x1)) |
→ |
s(s(s(p(p(s(s(c(p(s(p(s(x1)))))))))))) |
(2) |
c(s(x1)) |
→ |
p(s(p(s(a(p(s(p(s(x1))))))))) |
(3) |
p(p(s(x1))) |
→ |
p(x1) |
(4) |
p(s(x1)) |
→ |
x1 |
(5) |
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair),
the
pairs
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(x1)) |
(7) |
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(a(p(s(p(s(x1))))))) |
(8) |
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(p(s(x1)))) |
(9) |
c#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(p(s(a(p(s(p(s(x1))))))))) |
(10) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(x1)) |
(12) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(s(c(p(s(p(s(x1)))))))) |
(13) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(p(s(x1)))) |
(14) |
b#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(p(s(s(c(p(s(p(s(x1))))))))) |
(15) |
a#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(b(p(p(s(s(x1))))))) |
(17) |
a#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(s(s(x1))) |
(18) |
a#(s(x1)) |
→ |
p#(p(s(s(x1)))) |
(19) |
and
no rules
could be deleted.
1.1.1 Dependency Graph Processor
The dependency pairs are split into 2
components.