The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
The dependency pairs are split into 5
components.
-
The
1st
component contains the
pair
|
pr#(x,s(s(y))) |
→ |
if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y)) |
(36) |
|
if#(false,x,y) |
→ |
pr#(x,y) |
(38) |
1.1.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
if#(false,x,y) |
→ |
pr#(x,y) |
(38) |
|
|
| 2 |
≥ |
1 |
| 3 |
≥ |
2 |
|
pr#(x,s(s(y))) |
→ |
if#(divides(s(s(y)),x),x,s(y)) |
(36) |
|
|
| 1 |
≥ |
2 |
| 2 |
> |
3 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
2nd
component contains the
pair
|
div#(x,y) |
→ |
quot#(x,y,y) |
(26) |
|
quot#(s(x),s(y),z) |
→ |
quot#(x,y,z) |
(27) |
|
quot#(x,0,s(z)) |
→ |
div#(x,s(z)) |
(28) |
|
div#(div(x,y),z) |
→ |
div#(x,times(y,z)) |
(29) |
1.1.2 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the Knuth Bendix order with w0 = 1 and the following precedence and weight functions
| prec(div) |
= |
1 |
|
weight(div) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
in combination with the following argument filter
| π(div#) |
= |
1 |
| π(quot#) |
= |
1 |
| π(s) |
= |
1 |
| π(div) |
= |
[1] |
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
pair
|
div#(div(x,y),z) |
→ |
div#(x,times(y,z)) |
(29) |
could be deleted.
1.1.2.1 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the Knuth Bendix order with w0 = 1 and the following precedence and weight functions
| prec(s) |
= |
0 |
|
weight(s) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
in combination with the following argument filter
| π(div#) |
= |
1 |
| π(quot#) |
= |
1 |
| π(s) |
= |
[1] |
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
pair
|
quot#(s(x),s(y),z) |
→ |
quot#(x,y,z) |
(27) |
could be deleted.
1.1.2.1.1 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the Knuth Bendix order with w0 = 1 and the following precedence and weight functions
| prec(0) |
= |
1 |
|
weight(0) |
= |
2 |
|
|
|
| prec(s) |
= |
0 |
|
weight(s) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
in combination with the following argument filter
| π(div#) |
= |
2 |
| π(quot#) |
= |
2 |
| π(0) |
= |
[] |
| π(s) |
= |
[] |
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
pair
|
quot#(x,0,s(z)) |
→ |
div#(x,s(z)) |
(28) |
could be deleted.
1.1.2.1.1.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
div#(x,y) |
→ |
quot#(x,y,y) |
(26) |
|
|
| 1 |
≥ |
1 |
| 2 |
≥ |
2 |
| 2 |
≥ |
3 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
3rd
component contains the
pair
|
times#(s(x),y) |
→ |
times#(x,y) |
(25) |
1.1.3 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [s(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [times#(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 1 · x2
|
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
rule
could be deleted.
1.1.3.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
times#(s(x),y) |
→ |
times#(x,y) |
(25) |
|
|
| 1 |
> |
1 |
| 2 |
≥ |
2 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
4th
component contains the
pair
|
plus#(s(x),y) |
→ |
plus#(x,y) |
(23) |
1.1.4 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [s(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [plus#(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 1 · x2
|
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
rule
could be deleted.
1.1.4.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
plus#(s(x),y) |
→ |
plus#(x,y) |
(23) |
|
|
| 1 |
> |
1 |
| 2 |
≥ |
2 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
5th
component contains the
pair
|
eq#(s(x),s(y)) |
→ |
eq#(x,y) |
(31) |
1.1.5 Monotonic Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
| [s(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
| [eq#(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 1 · x2
|
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
rule
could be deleted.
1.1.5.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
|
eq#(s(x),s(y)) |
→ |
eq#(x,y) |
(31) |
|
|
| 1 |
> |
1 |
| 2 |
> |
2 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.