Certification Problem
Input (TPDB TRS_Standard/Transformed_CSR_04/PEANO_nosorts_GM)
The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
a__and(tt,X) |
→ |
mark(X) |
(1) |
a__plus(N,0) |
→ |
mark(N) |
(2) |
a__plus(N,s(M)) |
→ |
s(a__plus(mark(N),mark(M))) |
(3) |
mark(and(X1,X2)) |
→ |
a__and(mark(X1),X2) |
(4) |
mark(plus(X1,X2)) |
→ |
a__plus(mark(X1),mark(X2)) |
(5) |
mark(tt) |
→ |
tt |
(6) |
mark(0) |
→ |
0 |
(7) |
mark(s(X)) |
→ |
s(mark(X)) |
(8) |
a__and(X1,X2) |
→ |
and(X1,X2) |
(9) |
a__plus(X1,X2) |
→ |
plus(X1,X2) |
(10) |
Property / Task
Prove or disprove termination.Answer / Result
Yes.Proof (by AProVE @ termCOMP 2023)
1 Rule Removal
Using the
linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
[a__and(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 2 · x2
|
[tt] |
= |
2 |
[mark(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
[a__plus(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 2 · x2
|
[0] |
= |
0 |
[s(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1
|
[and(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 2 · x2
|
[plus(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 2 · x2
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
a__and(tt,X) |
→ |
mark(X) |
(1) |
1.1 Rule Removal
Using the
Knuth Bendix order with w0 = 1 and the following precedence and weight functions
prec(0) |
= |
2 |
|
weight(0) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
prec(tt) |
= |
6 |
|
weight(tt) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
prec(mark) |
= |
7 |
|
weight(mark) |
= |
0 |
|
|
|
prec(s) |
= |
0 |
|
weight(s) |
= |
1 |
|
|
|
prec(a__plus) |
= |
4 |
|
weight(a__plus) |
= |
0 |
|
|
|
prec(and) |
= |
1 |
|
weight(and) |
= |
0 |
|
|
|
prec(a__and) |
= |
5 |
|
weight(a__and) |
= |
0 |
|
|
|
prec(plus) |
= |
3 |
|
weight(plus) |
= |
0 |
|
|
|
all of the following rules can be deleted.
a__plus(N,0) |
→ |
mark(N) |
(2) |
a__plus(N,s(M)) |
→ |
s(a__plus(mark(N),mark(M))) |
(3) |
mark(and(X1,X2)) |
→ |
a__and(mark(X1),X2) |
(4) |
mark(plus(X1,X2)) |
→ |
a__plus(mark(X1),mark(X2)) |
(5) |
mark(tt) |
→ |
tt |
(6) |
mark(0) |
→ |
0 |
(7) |
mark(s(X)) |
→ |
s(mark(X)) |
(8) |
a__and(X1,X2) |
→ |
and(X1,X2) |
(9) |
a__plus(X1,X2) |
→ |
plus(X1,X2) |
(10) |
1.1.1 R is empty
There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.