The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
| .(.(x,y),z) | → | .(x,.(y,z)) | (1) |
| .#(.(x,y),z) | → | .#(y,z) | (2) |
| .#(.(x,y),z) | → | .#(x,.(y,z)) | (3) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| .#(.(x,y),z) | → | .#(x,.(y,z)) | (3) |
| .#(.(x,y),z) | → | .#(y,z) | (2) |
| [.#(x1, x2)] | = | x1 + 0 |
| [.(x1, x2)] | = | x1 + x2 + 1 |
| .#(.(x,y),z) | → | .#(x,.(y,z)) | (3) |
| .#(.(x,y),z) | → | .#(y,z) | (2) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.