The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
:(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :(:(x,z),:(:(:(x,y),z),u)) | (1) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(x,z) | (2) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(x,y) | (3) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(:(x,y),z),u) | (4) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(x,z),:(:(:(x,y),z),u)) | (5) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(x,y),z) | (6) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(x,y),z) | (6) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(x,z),:(:(:(x,y),z),u)) | (5) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(:(x,y),z),u) | (4) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(x,y) | (3) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(x,z) | (2) |
[:#(x1, x2)] | = | max(x1 + 28959, x2 + 28958, 0) |
[C] | = | 38 |
[:(x1, x2)] | = | max(x1 + 1, x2 + 0, 0) |
:(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :(:(x,z),:(:(:(x,y),z),u)) | (1) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(x,y),z) | (6) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(x,y) | (3) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(x,z) | (2) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(:(x,y),z),u) | (4) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(x,z),:(:(:(x,y),z),u)) | (5) |
prec(:#) | = | 1 | status(:#) | = | [1] | list-extension(:#) | = | Lex | ||
prec(C) | = | 0 | status(C) | = | [] | list-extension(C) | = | Lex | ||
prec(:) | = | 2 | status(:) | = | [1, 2] | list-extension(:) | = | Lex |
[:#(x1, x2)] | = | max(x1 + 0, 0) |
[C] | = | 0 |
[:(x1, x2)] | = | max(x1 + 0, x2 + 0, 0) |
:(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :(:(x,z),:(:(:(x,y),z),u)) | (1) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(:(x,y),z),u) | (4) |
:#(:(:(:(C,x),y),z),u) | → | :#(:(x,z),:(:(:(x,y),z),u)) | (5) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.