The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
| p(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p(a(x2),p(a(a(b(x0))),x2)) | (1) |
| p#(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p#(a(a(b(x0))),x2) | (2) |
| p#(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p#(a(x2),p(a(a(b(x0))),x2)) | (3) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| p#(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p#(a(x2),p(a(a(b(x0))),x2)) | (3) |
| p#(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p#(a(a(b(x0))),x2) | (2) |
| [a(x1)] | = | 1 |
| [b(x1)] | = | 1 |
| [p#(x1, x2)] | = | x2 + 0 |
| [p(x1, x2)] | = | x2 + 21239 |
| p(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p(a(x2),p(a(a(b(x0))),x2)) | (1) |
| p#(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p#(a(a(b(x0))),x2) | (2) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| p#(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p#(a(x2),p(a(a(b(x0))),x2)) | (3) |
| prec(a) | = | 0 | status(a) | = | [1] | list-extension(a) | = | Lex | ||
| prec(b) | = | 0 | status(b) | = | [] | list-extension(b) | = | Lex | ||
| prec(p#) | = | 1 | status(p#) | = | [2] | list-extension(p#) | = | Lex | ||
| prec(p) | = | 1 | status(p) | = | [2, 1] | list-extension(p) | = | Lex |
| [a(x1)] | = | x1 + 0 |
| [b(x1)] | = | 0 |
| [p#(x1, x2)] | = | max(x2 + 0, 0) |
| [p(x1, x2)] | = | max(x1 + 0, x2 + 0, 0) |
| p(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p(a(x2),p(a(a(b(x0))),x2)) | (1) |
| p#(a(x0),p(a(a(a(x1))),x2)) | → | p#(a(x2),p(a(a(b(x0))),x2)) | (3) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.