The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
| b(b(0,y),x) | → | y | (1) |
| c(c(c(y))) | → | c(c(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0))) | (2) |
| a(y,0) | → | b(y,0) | (3) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | c#(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0)) | (4) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | b#(0,y) | (5) |
| a#(y,0) | → | b#(y,0) | (6) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | c#(b(0,y)) | (7) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | a#(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0) | (8) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | c#(c(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0))) | (9) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | a#(c(b(0,y)),0) | (10) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | c#(c(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0))) | (9) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | c#(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0)) | (4) |
| [a(x1, x2)] | = | x1 + 0 |
| [b(x1, x2)] | = | x1 + x2 + 0 |
| [c(x1)] | = | x1 + 20163 |
| [0] | = | 0 |
| [c#(x1)] | = | x1 + 0 |
| [a#(x1, x2)] | = | 0 |
| [b#(x1, x2)] | = | 0 |
| b(b(0,y),x) | → | y | (1) |
| a(y,0) | → | b(y,0) | (3) |
| c(c(c(y))) | → | c(c(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0))) | (2) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | c#(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0)) | (4) |
The dependency pairs are split into 1 component.
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | c#(c(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0))) | (9) |
| [a(x1, x2)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| [b(x1, x2)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| [c(x1)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| [0] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| [c#(x1)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| [a#(x1, x2)] | = |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
| [b#(x1, x2)] | = |
|
| b(b(0,y),x) | → | y | (1) |
| a(y,0) | → | b(y,0) | (3) |
| c(c(c(y))) | → | c(c(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0))) | (2) |
| c#(c(c(y))) | → | c#(c(a(a(c(b(0,y)),0),0))) | (9) |
The dependency pairs are split into 0 components.