The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
The dependency pairs are split into 9
components.
-
The
1st
component contains the
pair
bs#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
bs#(z) |
(64) |
bs#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
bs#(y) |
(65) |
1.1.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
bs#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
bs#(z) |
(64) |
|
1 |
> |
1 |
bs#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
bs#(y) |
(65) |
|
1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
2nd
component contains the
pair
min#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
min#(y) |
(62) |
1.1.2 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
min#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
min#(y) |
(62) |
|
1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
3rd
component contains the
pair
max#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
max#(z) |
(63) |
1.1.3 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
max#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
max#(z) |
(63) |
|
1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
4th
component contains the
pair
wb#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
wb#(z) |
(77) |
wb#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
wb#(y) |
(78) |
1.1.4 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
wb#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
wb#(z) |
(77) |
|
1 |
> |
1 |
wb#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
wb#(y) |
(78) |
|
1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
5th
component contains the
pair
-#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
-#(x,y) |
(54) |
-#(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
-#(x,y) |
(53) |
-#(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
-#(-(x,y),1(#)) |
(52) |
-#(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
-#(x,y) |
(51) |
-#(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
-#(x,y) |
(49) |
1.1.5 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the arctic semiring over the integers
[-(x1, x2)] |
= |
0 · x1 +
-∞ · x2 +
-∞ |
[0(x1)] |
= |
4 · x1 + 6 |
[1(x1)] |
= |
4 · x1 + 6 |
[-#(x1, x2)] |
= |
0 · x1 + 0 · x2 +
-∞ |
[#] |
= |
0 |
together with the usable
rules
-(x,#) |
→ |
x |
(9) |
-(#,x) |
→ |
# |
(10) |
-(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
0(-(x,y)) |
(11) |
-(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
1(-(-(x,y),1(#))) |
(12) |
-(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
1(-(x,y)) |
(13) |
-(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
0(-(x,y)) |
(14) |
0(#) |
→ |
# |
(1) |
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair),
the
pairs
-#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
-#(x,y) |
(54) |
-#(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
-#(x,y) |
(53) |
-#(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
-#(x,y) |
(51) |
-#(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
-#(x,y) |
(49) |
could be deleted.
1.1.5.1 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the arctic semiring over the integers
[-(x1, x2)] |
= |
0 · x1 +
-∞ · x2 +
-∞ |
[0(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1 +
-∞ |
[1(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1 +
-∞ |
[-#(x1, x2)] |
= |
0 · x1 +
-∞ · x2 +
-∞ |
[#] |
= |
3 |
together with the usable
rules
-(x,#) |
→ |
x |
(9) |
-(#,x) |
→ |
# |
(10) |
-(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
0(-(x,y)) |
(11) |
-(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
1(-(-(x,y),1(#))) |
(12) |
-(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
1(-(x,y)) |
(13) |
-(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
0(-(x,y)) |
(14) |
0(#) |
→ |
# |
(1) |
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair),
the
pair
-#(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
-#(-(x,y),1(#)) |
(52) |
could be deleted.
1.1.5.1.1 P is empty
There are no pairs anymore.
-
The
6th
component contains the
pair
size#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
size#(x) |
(74) |
size#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
size#(y) |
(73) |
1.1.6 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
size#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
size#(x) |
(74) |
|
1 |
> |
1 |
size#(n(x,y,z)) |
→ |
size#(y) |
(73) |
|
1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
7th
component contains the
pair
+#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
+#(+(x,y),1(#)) |
(45) |
+#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(44) |
+#(x,+(y,z)) |
→ |
+#(+(x,y),z) |
(48) |
+#(x,+(y,z)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(47) |
+#(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(43) |
+#(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(42) |
+#(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(40) |
1.1.7 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the arctic semiring over the integers
[0(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1 +
-∞ |
[1(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 1 |
[#] |
= |
0 |
[+#(x1, x2)] |
= |
-∞ · x1 + 2 · x2 + 0 |
[+(x1, x2)] |
= |
2 · x1 + 0 · x2 +
-∞ |
having no usable rules (w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the
reduction pair),
the
pairs
+#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(44) |
+#(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(42) |
could be deleted.
1.1.7.1 Dependency Graph Processor
The dependency pairs are split into 2
components.
-
The
1st
component contains the
pair
+#(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(43) |
+#(x,+(y,z)) |
→ |
+#(+(x,y),z) |
(48) |
+#(x,+(y,z)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(47) |
+#(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(40) |
1.1.7.1.1 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
+#(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(43) |
|
2 |
> |
2 |
1 |
> |
1 |
+#(x,+(y,z)) |
→ |
+#(+(x,y),z) |
(48) |
|
2 |
> |
2 |
+#(x,+(y,z)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(47) |
|
2 |
> |
2 |
1 |
≥ |
1 |
+#(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
+#(x,y) |
(40) |
|
2 |
> |
2 |
1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
2nd
component contains the
pair
+#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
+#(+(x,y),1(#)) |
(45) |
1.1.7.1.2 Reduction Pair Processor with Usable Rules
Using the linear polynomial interpretation over the naturals
[0(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 4 |
[1(x1)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 4 |
[#] |
= |
0 |
[+#(x1, x2)] |
= |
2 · x1 + 4 · x2 + 0 |
[+(x1, x2)] |
= |
1 · x1 + 2 · x2 + 0 |
together with the usable
rules
+(x,#) |
→ |
x |
(2) |
+(#,x) |
→ |
x |
(3) |
+(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
0(+(x,y)) |
(4) |
+(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
1(+(x,y)) |
(5) |
+(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
1(+(x,y)) |
(6) |
+(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
0(+(+(x,y),1(#))) |
(7) |
+(x,+(y,z)) |
→ |
+(+(x,y),z) |
(8) |
0(#) |
→ |
# |
(1) |
(w.r.t. the implicit argument filter of the reduction pair),
the
pair
+#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
+#(+(x,y),1(#)) |
(45) |
could be deleted.
1.1.7.1.2.1 P is empty
There are no pairs anymore.
-
The
8th
component contains the
pair
ge#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
ge#(x,y) |
(60) |
ge#(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
ge#(x,y) |
(59) |
ge#(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
ge#(y,x) |
(57) |
ge#(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
ge#(x,y) |
(56) |
1.1.8 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
ge#(1(x),1(y)) |
→ |
ge#(x,y) |
(60) |
|
2 |
> |
2 |
1 |
> |
1 |
ge#(1(x),0(y)) |
→ |
ge#(x,y) |
(59) |
|
2 |
> |
2 |
1 |
> |
1 |
ge#(0(x),1(y)) |
→ |
ge#(y,x) |
(57) |
|
2 |
> |
1 |
1 |
> |
2 |
ge#(0(x),0(y)) |
→ |
ge#(x,y) |
(56) |
|
2 |
> |
2 |
1 |
> |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.
-
The
9th
component contains the
pair
ge#(#,0(x)) |
→ |
ge#(#,x) |
(61) |
1.1.9 Size-Change Termination
Using size-change termination in combination with
the subterm criterion
one obtains the following initial size-change graphs.
ge#(#,0(x)) |
→ |
ge#(#,x) |
(61) |
|
2 |
> |
2 |
1 |
≥ |
1 |
As there is no critical graph in the transitive closure, there are no infinite chains.