Certification Problem

Input (TPDB TRS_Standard/SK90/4.22)

The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.

not(and(x,y)) or(not(x),not(y)) (1)
not(or(x,y)) and(not(x),not(y)) (2)
and(x,or(y,z)) or(and(x,y),and(x,z)) (3)

Property / Task

Prove or disprove termination.

Answer / Result

Yes.

Proof (by ttt2 @ termCOMP 2023)

1 Rule Removal

Using the Weighted Path Order with the following precedence and status
prec(or) = 0 status(or) = [1, 2] list-extension(or) = Lex
prec(not) = 3 status(not) = [1] list-extension(not) = Lex
prec(and) = 1 status(and) = [1, 2] list-extension(and) = Lex
and the following Max-polynomial interpretation
[or(x1, x2)] = max(0, 0 + 1 · x1, 0 + 1 · x2)
[not(x1)] = max(0, 0 + 1 · x1)
[and(x1, x2)] = max(0, 0 + 1 · x1, 0 + 1 · x2)
all of the following rules can be deleted.
not(and(x,y)) or(not(x),not(y)) (1)
not(or(x,y)) and(not(x),not(y)) (2)
and(x,or(y,z)) or(and(x,y),and(x,z)) (3)

1.1 R is empty

There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.