The rewrite relation of the following TRS is considered.
f(s(x1),x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (1) |
f(0,s(x2),x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x2,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (2) |
f(0,0,s(x3),x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x3,x3,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (3) |
f(0,0,0,s(x4),x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x4,x4,x4,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (4) |
f(0,0,0,0,s(x5),x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x5,x5,x5,x5,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (5) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,s(x6),x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x6,x6,x6,x6,x6,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (6) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,s(x7),x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x7,x7,x7,x7,x7,x7,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (7) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,s(x8),x9,x10) | → | f(x8,x8,x8,x8,x8,x8,x8,x8,x9,x10) | (8) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,s(x9),x10) | → | f(x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x10) | (9) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,s(x10)) | → | f(x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10) | (10) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) | → | 0 | (11) |
[f(x1,...,x10)] | = | 5 · x1 + 2 · x2 + 1 · x3 + 1 · x4 + 3 · x5 + 5 · x6 + 2 · x7 + 5 · x8 + 3 · x9 + 4 · x10 + 3 |
[s(x1)] | = | 12 · x1 + 16 |
[0] | = | 0 |
f(s(x1),x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (1) |
f(0,s(x2),x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x2,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (2) |
f(0,0,s(x3),x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x3,x3,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (3) |
f(0,0,0,s(x4),x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x4,x4,x4,x4,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (4) |
f(0,0,0,0,s(x5),x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x5,x5,x5,x5,x5,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (5) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,s(x6),x7,x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x6,x6,x6,x6,x6,x6,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (6) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,s(x7),x8,x9,x10) | → | f(x7,x7,x7,x7,x7,x7,x7,x8,x9,x10) | (7) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,s(x8),x9,x10) | → | f(x8,x8,x8,x8,x8,x8,x8,x8,x9,x10) | (8) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,s(x9),x10) | → | f(x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x9,x10) | (9) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,s(x10)) | → | f(x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10,x10) | (10) |
f(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0) | → | 0 | (11) |
There are no rules in the TRS. Hence, it is terminating.