MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { dbl(X) -> n__dbl(X) , dbl(0()) -> 0() , dbl(s(X)) -> s(n__s(n__dbl(activate(X)))) , s(X) -> n__s(X) , activate(X) -> X , activate(n__s(X)) -> s(X) , activate(n__dbl(X)) -> dbl(activate(X)) , activate(n__dbls(X)) -> dbls(activate(X)) , activate(n__sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(activate(X1), activate(X2)) , activate(n__indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(activate(X1), X2) , activate(n__from(X)) -> from(X) , dbls(X) -> n__dbls(X) , dbls(nil()) -> nil() , dbls(cons(X, Y)) -> cons(n__dbl(activate(X)), n__dbls(activate(Y))) , sel(X1, X2) -> n__sel(X1, X2) , sel(0(), cons(X, Y)) -> activate(X) , sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(activate(X), activate(Z)) , indx(X1, X2) -> n__indx(X1, X2) , indx(nil(), X) -> nil() , indx(cons(X, Y), Z) -> cons(n__sel(activate(X), activate(Z)), n__indx(activate(Y), activate(Z))) , from(X) -> cons(activate(X), n__from(n__s(activate(X)))) , from(X) -> n__from(X) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms: { dbl(s(X)) -> s(n__s(n__dbl(activate(X)))) , sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(activate(X), activate(Z)) } All above mentioned rules can be savely removed. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { dbl(X) -> n__dbl(X) , dbl(0()) -> 0() , s(X) -> n__s(X) , activate(X) -> X , activate(n__s(X)) -> s(X) , activate(n__dbl(X)) -> dbl(activate(X)) , activate(n__dbls(X)) -> dbls(activate(X)) , activate(n__sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(activate(X1), activate(X2)) , activate(n__indx(X1, X2)) -> indx(activate(X1), X2) , activate(n__from(X)) -> from(X) , dbls(X) -> n__dbls(X) , dbls(nil()) -> nil() , dbls(cons(X, Y)) -> cons(n__dbl(activate(X)), n__dbls(activate(Y))) , sel(X1, X2) -> n__sel(X1, X2) , sel(0(), cons(X, Y)) -> activate(X) , indx(X1, X2) -> n__indx(X1, X2) , indx(nil(), X) -> nil() , indx(cons(X, Y), Z) -> cons(n__sel(activate(X), activate(Z)), n__indx(activate(Y), activate(Z))) , from(X) -> cons(activate(X), n__from(n__s(activate(X)))) , from(X) -> n__from(X) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. Arrrr..