MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { sel(X1, X2) -> n__sel(X1, X2) , sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z)) , sel(0(), cons(X, Z)) -> X , s(X) -> n__s(X) , cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) , activate(X) -> X , activate(n__first(X1, X2)) -> first(X1, X2) , activate(n__from(X)) -> from(X) , activate(n__0()) -> 0() , activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) , activate(n__nil()) -> nil() , activate(n__s(X)) -> s(X) , activate(n__sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, X2) , 0() -> n__0() , first(X1, X2) -> n__first(X1, X2) , first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, n__first(X, activate(Z))) , first(0(), Z) -> nil() , nil() -> n__nil() , from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(s(X))) , from(X) -> n__from(X) , sel1(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel1(X, activate(Z)) , sel1(0(), cons(X, Z)) -> quote(X) , quote(n__0()) -> 01() , quote(n__s(X)) -> s1(quote(activate(X))) , quote(n__sel(X, Z)) -> sel1(activate(X), activate(Z)) , first1(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons1(quote(Y), first1(X, activate(Z))) , first1(0(), Z) -> nil1() , quote1(n__first(X, Z)) -> first1(activate(X), activate(Z)) , quote1(n__cons(X, Z)) -> cons1(quote(activate(X)), quote1(activate(Z))) , quote1(n__nil()) -> nil1() , unquote(01()) -> 0() , unquote(s1(X)) -> s(unquote(X)) , unquote1(nil1()) -> nil() , unquote1(cons1(X, Z)) -> fcons(unquote(X), unquote1(Z)) , fcons(X, Z) -> cons(X, Z) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Arguments of following rules are not normal-forms: { sel(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel(X, activate(Z)) , sel(0(), cons(X, Z)) -> X , first(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons(Y, n__first(X, activate(Z))) , first(0(), Z) -> nil() , sel1(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> sel1(X, activate(Z)) , sel1(0(), cons(X, Z)) -> quote(X) , first1(s(X), cons(Y, Z)) -> cons1(quote(Y), first1(X, activate(Z))) , first1(0(), Z) -> nil1() } All above mentioned rules can be savely removed. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { sel(X1, X2) -> n__sel(X1, X2) , s(X) -> n__s(X) , cons(X1, X2) -> n__cons(X1, X2) , activate(X) -> X , activate(n__first(X1, X2)) -> first(X1, X2) , activate(n__from(X)) -> from(X) , activate(n__0()) -> 0() , activate(n__cons(X1, X2)) -> cons(X1, X2) , activate(n__nil()) -> nil() , activate(n__s(X)) -> s(X) , activate(n__sel(X1, X2)) -> sel(X1, X2) , 0() -> n__0() , first(X1, X2) -> n__first(X1, X2) , nil() -> n__nil() , from(X) -> cons(X, n__from(s(X))) , from(X) -> n__from(X) , quote(n__0()) -> 01() , quote(n__s(X)) -> s1(quote(activate(X))) , quote(n__sel(X, Z)) -> sel1(activate(X), activate(Z)) , quote1(n__first(X, Z)) -> first1(activate(X), activate(Z)) , quote1(n__cons(X, Z)) -> cons1(quote(activate(X)), quote1(activate(Z))) , quote1(n__nil()) -> nil1() , unquote(01()) -> 0() , unquote(s1(X)) -> s(unquote(X)) , unquote1(nil1()) -> nil() , unquote1(cons1(X, Z)) -> fcons(unquote(X), unquote1(Z)) , fcons(X, Z) -> cons(X, Z) } Obligation: innermost runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'empty' failed due to the following reason: Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 2) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The input cannot be shown compatible 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. Arrrr..