MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { cond(true(), x) -> cond(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x)) , and(x, false()) -> false() , and(true(), true()) -> true() , and(false(), x) -> false() , even(0()) -> true() , even(s(0())) -> false() , even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y())) -> gr(x, y()) , p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x) -> c_1(cond^#(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x))) , and^#(x, false()) -> c_2() , and^#(true(), true()) -> c_3() , and^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , even^#(0()) -> c_5() , even^#(s(0())) -> c_6() , even^#(s(s(x))) -> c_7(even^#(x)) , gr^#(0(), x) -> c_8() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_9() , gr^#(s(x), s(y())) -> c_10(gr^#(x, y())) , p^#(0()) -> c_11() , p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x) -> c_1(cond^#(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x))) , and^#(x, false()) -> c_2() , and^#(true(), true()) -> c_3() , and^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , even^#(0()) -> c_5() , even^#(s(0())) -> c_6() , even^#(s(s(x))) -> c_7(even^#(x)) , gr^#(0(), x) -> c_8() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_9() , gr^#(s(x), s(y())) -> c_10(gr^#(x, y())) , p^#(0()) -> c_11() , p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) } Strict Trs: { cond(true(), x) -> cond(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x)) , and(x, false()) -> false() , and(true(), true()) -> true() , and(false(), x) -> false() , even(0()) -> true() , even(s(0())) -> false() , even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y())) -> gr(x, y()) , p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {2,3,4,5,6,8,9,11} by applications of Pre({2,3,4,5,6,8,9,11}) = {7,10,12}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: cond^#(true(), x) -> c_1(cond^#(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x))) , 2: and^#(x, false()) -> c_2() , 3: and^#(true(), true()) -> c_3() , 4: and^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , 5: even^#(0()) -> c_5() , 6: even^#(s(0())) -> c_6() , 7: even^#(s(s(x))) -> c_7(even^#(x)) , 8: gr^#(0(), x) -> c_8() , 9: gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_9() , 10: gr^#(s(x), s(y())) -> c_10(gr^#(x, y())) , 11: p^#(0()) -> c_11() , 12: p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x) -> c_1(cond^#(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x))) , even^#(s(s(x))) -> c_7(even^#(x)) , gr^#(s(x), s(y())) -> c_10(gr^#(x, y())) , p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) } Strict Trs: { cond(true(), x) -> cond(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x)) , and(x, false()) -> false() , and(true(), true()) -> true() , and(false(), x) -> false() , even(0()) -> true() , even(s(0())) -> false() , even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y())) -> gr(x, y()) , p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x } Weak DPs: { and^#(x, false()) -> c_2() , and^#(true(), true()) -> c_3() , and^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , even^#(0()) -> c_5() , even^#(s(0())) -> c_6() , gr^#(0(), x) -> c_8() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_9() , p^#(0()) -> c_11() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {3} by applications of Pre({3}) = {4}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: cond^#(true(), x) -> c_1(cond^#(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x))) , 2: even^#(s(s(x))) -> c_7(even^#(x)) , 3: gr^#(s(x), s(y())) -> c_10(gr^#(x, y())) , 4: p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) , 5: and^#(x, false()) -> c_2() , 6: and^#(true(), true()) -> c_3() , 7: and^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , 8: even^#(0()) -> c_5() , 9: even^#(s(0())) -> c_6() , 10: gr^#(0(), x) -> c_8() , 11: gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_9() , 12: p^#(0()) -> c_11() } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { cond^#(true(), x) -> c_1(cond^#(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x))) , even^#(s(s(x))) -> c_7(even^#(x)) , p^#(s(x)) -> c_12(x) } Strict Trs: { cond(true(), x) -> cond(and(even(x), gr(x, 0())), p(x)) , and(x, false()) -> false() , and(true(), true()) -> true() , and(false(), x) -> false() , even(0()) -> true() , even(s(0())) -> false() , even(s(s(x))) -> even(x) , gr(0(), x) -> false() , gr(s(x), 0()) -> true() , gr(s(x), s(y())) -> gr(x, y()) , p(0()) -> 0() , p(s(x)) -> x } Weak DPs: { and^#(x, false()) -> c_2() , and^#(true(), true()) -> c_3() , and^#(false(), x) -> c_4() , even^#(0()) -> c_5() , even^#(s(0())) -> c_6() , gr^#(0(), x) -> c_8() , gr^#(s(x), 0()) -> c_9() , gr^#(s(x), s(y())) -> c_10(gr^#(x, y())) , p^#(0()) -> c_11() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..