MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { sort(nil()) -> nil() , sort(cons(x, y)) -> insert(x, sort(y)) , insert(x, nil()) -> cons(x, nil()) , insert(x, cons(v, w)) -> choose(x, cons(v, w), x, v) , choose(x, cons(v, w), y, 0()) -> cons(x, cons(v, w)) , choose(x, cons(v, w), 0(), s(z)) -> cons(v, insert(x, w)) , choose(x, cons(v, w), s(y), s(z)) -> choose(x, cons(v, w), y, z) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { sort^#(nil()) -> c_1() , sort^#(cons(x, y)) -> c_2(insert^#(x, sort(y))) , insert^#(x, nil()) -> c_3(x) , insert^#(x, cons(v, w)) -> c_4(choose^#(x, cons(v, w), x, v)) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), y, 0()) -> c_5(x, v, w) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), 0(), s(z)) -> c_6(v, insert^#(x, w)) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), s(y), s(z)) -> c_7(choose^#(x, cons(v, w), y, z)) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { sort^#(nil()) -> c_1() , sort^#(cons(x, y)) -> c_2(insert^#(x, sort(y))) , insert^#(x, nil()) -> c_3(x) , insert^#(x, cons(v, w)) -> c_4(choose^#(x, cons(v, w), x, v)) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), y, 0()) -> c_5(x, v, w) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), 0(), s(z)) -> c_6(v, insert^#(x, w)) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), s(y), s(z)) -> c_7(choose^#(x, cons(v, w), y, z)) } Strict Trs: { sort(nil()) -> nil() , sort(cons(x, y)) -> insert(x, sort(y)) , insert(x, nil()) -> cons(x, nil()) , insert(x, cons(v, w)) -> choose(x, cons(v, w), x, v) , choose(x, cons(v, w), y, 0()) -> cons(x, cons(v, w)) , choose(x, cons(v, w), 0(), s(z)) -> cons(v, insert(x, w)) , choose(x, cons(v, w), s(y), s(z)) -> choose(x, cons(v, w), y, z) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {1} by applications of Pre({1}) = {3,5,6}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: sort^#(nil()) -> c_1() , 2: sort^#(cons(x, y)) -> c_2(insert^#(x, sort(y))) , 3: insert^#(x, nil()) -> c_3(x) , 4: insert^#(x, cons(v, w)) -> c_4(choose^#(x, cons(v, w), x, v)) , 5: choose^#(x, cons(v, w), y, 0()) -> c_5(x, v, w) , 6: choose^#(x, cons(v, w), 0(), s(z)) -> c_6(v, insert^#(x, w)) , 7: choose^#(x, cons(v, w), s(y), s(z)) -> c_7(choose^#(x, cons(v, w), y, z)) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { sort^#(cons(x, y)) -> c_2(insert^#(x, sort(y))) , insert^#(x, nil()) -> c_3(x) , insert^#(x, cons(v, w)) -> c_4(choose^#(x, cons(v, w), x, v)) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), y, 0()) -> c_5(x, v, w) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), 0(), s(z)) -> c_6(v, insert^#(x, w)) , choose^#(x, cons(v, w), s(y), s(z)) -> c_7(choose^#(x, cons(v, w), y, z)) } Strict Trs: { sort(nil()) -> nil() , sort(cons(x, y)) -> insert(x, sort(y)) , insert(x, nil()) -> cons(x, nil()) , insert(x, cons(v, w)) -> choose(x, cons(v, w), x, v) , choose(x, cons(v, w), y, 0()) -> cons(x, cons(v, w)) , choose(x, cons(v, w), 0(), s(z)) -> cons(v, insert(x, w)) , choose(x, cons(v, w), s(y), s(z)) -> choose(x, cons(v, w), y, z) } Weak DPs: { sort^#(nil()) -> c_1() } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..