MAYBE We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict Trs: { merge(x, nil()) -> x , merge(nil(), y) -> y , merge(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> if(<(x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v))) , if(true(), x, y) -> x , if(false(), x, y) -> x , ++(nil(), y) -> y , ++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z)) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 60.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'WithProblem (timeout of 30 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: Computation stopped due to timeout after 30.0 seconds. 2) 'Best' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'bsearch-popstar (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 2) 'Polynomial Path Order (PS) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: The processor is inapplicable, reason: Processor only applicable for innermost runtime complexity analysis 3) 'Fastest (timeout of 5 seconds) (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: None of the processors succeeded. Details of failed attempt(s): ----------------------------- 1) 'Bounds with perSymbol-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 2) 'Bounds with minimal-enrichment and initial automaton 'match'' failed due to the following reason: match-boundness of the problem could not be verified. 3) 'Innermost Weak Dependency Pairs (timeout of 60 seconds)' failed due to the following reason: We add the following weak dependency pairs: Strict DPs: { merge^#(x, nil()) -> c_1(x) , merge^#(nil(), y) -> c_2(y) , merge^#(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> c_3(if^#(<(x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v)))) , if^#(true(), x, y) -> c_4(x) , if^#(false(), x, y) -> c_5(x) , ++^#(nil(), y) -> c_6(y) , ++^#(.(x, y), z) -> c_7(x, ++^#(y, z)) } and mark the set of starting terms. We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { merge^#(x, nil()) -> c_1(x) , merge^#(nil(), y) -> c_2(y) , merge^#(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> c_3(if^#(<(x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v)))) , if^#(true(), x, y) -> c_4(x) , if^#(false(), x, y) -> c_5(x) , ++^#(nil(), y) -> c_6(y) , ++^#(.(x, y), z) -> c_7(x, ++^#(y, z)) } Strict Trs: { merge(x, nil()) -> x , merge(nil(), y) -> y , merge(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> if(<(x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v))) , if(true(), x, y) -> x , if(false(), x, y) -> x , ++(nil(), y) -> y , ++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z)) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE We estimate the number of application of {3} by applications of Pre({3}) = {1,2,4,5,6,7}. Here rules are labeled as follows: DPs: { 1: merge^#(x, nil()) -> c_1(x) , 2: merge^#(nil(), y) -> c_2(y) , 3: merge^#(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> c_3(if^#(<(x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v)))) , 4: if^#(true(), x, y) -> c_4(x) , 5: if^#(false(), x, y) -> c_5(x) , 6: ++^#(nil(), y) -> c_6(y) , 7: ++^#(.(x, y), z) -> c_7(x, ++^#(y, z)) } We are left with following problem, upon which TcT provides the certificate MAYBE. Strict DPs: { merge^#(x, nil()) -> c_1(x) , merge^#(nil(), y) -> c_2(y) , if^#(true(), x, y) -> c_4(x) , if^#(false(), x, y) -> c_5(x) , ++^#(nil(), y) -> c_6(y) , ++^#(.(x, y), z) -> c_7(x, ++^#(y, z)) } Strict Trs: { merge(x, nil()) -> x , merge(nil(), y) -> y , merge(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> if(<(x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v))) , if(true(), x, y) -> x , if(false(), x, y) -> x , ++(nil(), y) -> y , ++(.(x, y), z) -> .(x, ++(y, z)) } Weak DPs: { merge^#(.(x, y), .(u, v)) -> c_3(if^#(<(x, u), .(x, merge(y, .(u, v))), .(u, merge(.(x, y), v)))) } Obligation: runtime complexity Answer: MAYBE Empty strict component of the problem is NOT empty. Arrrr..