LTS Termination Proof

by T2Cert

Input

Integer Transition System

Proof

1 Invariant Updates

The following invariants are asserted.

1: 4 − arg1P ≤ 0arg3P ≤ 0arg3P ≤ 04 − arg1 ≤ 0arg3 ≤ 0arg3 ≤ 0
2: TRUE
3: 1 − arg1P ≤ 04 − arg2P ≤ 01 − arg1 ≤ 04 − arg2 ≤ 01 − x51 ≤ 0x52 ≤ 0
4: 1 − x51 ≤ 0x52 ≤ 0
5: 1 − arg2P ≤ 01 − arg2 ≤ 0
6: TRUE

The invariants are proved as follows.

IMPACT Invariant Proof

2 Switch to Cooperation Termination Proof

We consider the following cutpoint-transitions:
4 9 4: x59 + x59 ≤ 0x59x59 ≤ 0x52 + x52 ≤ 0x52x52 ≤ 0x51 + x51 ≤ 0x51x51 ≤ 0x41 + x41 ≤ 0x41x41 ≤ 0x37 + x37 ≤ 0x37x37 ≤ 0x36 + x36 ≤ 0x36x36 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0
5 16 5: x59 + x59 ≤ 0x59x59 ≤ 0x52 + x52 ≤ 0x52x52 ≤ 0x51 + x51 ≤ 0x51x51 ≤ 0x41 + x41 ≤ 0x41x41 ≤ 0x37 + x37 ≤ 0x37x37 ≤ 0x36 + x36 ≤ 0x36x36 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0
and for every transition t, a duplicate t is considered.

3 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −19.

6: 0
2: 0
1: 0
3: 0
4: 0
5: 0
6: −7
2: −8
1: −9
3: −10
4: −11
4_var_snapshot: −11
4*: −11
5: −14
5_var_snapshot: −14
5*: −14

4 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

4* 12 4: x59 + x59 ≤ 0x59x59 ≤ 0x52 + x52 ≤ 0x52x52 ≤ 0x51 + x51 ≤ 0x51x51 ≤ 0x41 + x41 ≤ 0x41x41 ≤ 0x37 + x37 ≤ 0x37x37 ≤ 0x36 + x36 ≤ 0x36x36 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0

5 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

4 10 4_var_snapshot: x59 + x59 ≤ 0x59x59 ≤ 0x52 + x52 ≤ 0x52x52 ≤ 0x51 + x51 ≤ 0x51x51 ≤ 0x41 + x41 ≤ 0x41x41 ≤ 0x37 + x37 ≤ 0x37x37 ≤ 0x36 + x36 ≤ 0x36x36 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0

6 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

5* 19 5: x59 + x59 ≤ 0x59x59 ≤ 0x52 + x52 ≤ 0x52x52 ≤ 0x51 + x51 ≤ 0x51x51 ≤ 0x41 + x41 ≤ 0x41x41 ≤ 0x37 + x37 ≤ 0x37x37 ≤ 0x36 + x36 ≤ 0x36x36 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0

7 Location Addition

The following skip-transition is inserted and corresponding redirections w.r.t. the old location are performed.

5 17 5_var_snapshot: x59 + x59 ≤ 0x59x59 ≤ 0x52 + x52 ≤ 0x52x52 ≤ 0x51 + x51 ≤ 0x51x51 ≤ 0x41 + x41 ≤ 0x41x41 ≤ 0x37 + x37 ≤ 0x37x37 ≤ 0x36 + x36 ≤ 0x36x36 ≤ 0arg5P + arg5P ≤ 0arg5Parg5P ≤ 0arg5 + arg5 ≤ 0arg5arg5 ≤ 0arg4P + arg4P ≤ 0arg4Parg4P ≤ 0arg4 + arg4 ≤ 0arg4arg4 ≤ 0arg3P + arg3P ≤ 0arg3Parg3P ≤ 0arg3 + arg3 ≤ 0arg3arg3 ≤ 0arg2P + arg2P ≤ 0arg2Parg2P ≤ 0arg2 + arg2 ≤ 0arg2arg2 ≤ 0arg1P + arg1P ≤ 0arg1Parg1P ≤ 0arg1 + arg1 ≤ 0arg1arg1 ≤ 0

8 SCC Decomposition

We consider subproblems for each of the 2 SCC(s) of the program graph.

8.1 SCC Subproblem 1/2

Here we consider the SCC { 4, 4_var_snapshot, 4* }.

8.1.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 7 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 2.

4: 1 + 3⋅arg1
4_var_snapshot: 3⋅arg1
4*: 2 + 3⋅arg1

8.1.2 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 10, 12 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −1.

4: 0
4_var_snapshot: −1
4*: x51

8.1.3 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

We consider 1 subproblems corresponding to sets of cut-point transitions as follows.

8.1.3.1 Cut-Point Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider cut-point transition 9.

8.1.3.1.1 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.

8.2 SCC Subproblem 2/2

Here we consider the SCC { 5, 5_var_snapshot, 5* }.

8.2.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 6 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 5.

5: 1 + 3⋅arg1
5_var_snapshot: 3⋅arg1
5*: 2 + 3⋅arg1

8.2.2 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 17, 19 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −1.

5: 0
5_var_snapshot: −1
5*: 1

8.2.3 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

We consider 1 subproblems corresponding to sets of cut-point transitions as follows.

8.2.3.1 Cut-Point Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider cut-point transition 16.

8.2.3.1.1 Splitting Cut-Point Transitions

There remain no cut-point transition to consider. Hence the cooperation termination is trivial.

Tool configuration

T2Cert