LTS Termination Proof

by AProVE

Input

Integer Transition System

Proof

1 Switch to Cooperation Termination Proof

We consider the following cutpoint-transitions:
f48_0_rec_GE f48_0_rec_GE f48_0_rec_GE: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3
f77_0_descend_LE f77_0_descend_LE f77_0_descend_LE: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3
f1_0_main_Load f1_0_main_Load f1_0_main_Load: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3
f33_0_rec_Cmp f33_0_rec_Cmp f33_0_rec_Cmp: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3
__init __init __init: x1 = x1x2 = x2x3 = x3
and for every transition t, a duplicate t is considered.

2 SCC Decomposition

We consider subproblems for each of the 2 SCC(s) of the program graph.

2.1 SCC Subproblem 1/2

Here we consider the SCC { f48_0_rec_GE, f33_0_rec_Cmp }.

2.1.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 3 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

f33_0_rec_Cmp: −1 + x1
f48_0_rec_GE: −1 + x1

2.1.2 Transition Removal

We remove transition 6 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

f33_0_rec_Cmp: 99 − x1
f48_0_rec_GE: 99 − x2

2.1.3 Transition Removal

We remove transition 2 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

f33_0_rec_Cmp: 0
f48_0_rec_GE: −1

2.1.4 Trivial Cooperation Program

There are no more "sharp" transitions in the cooperation program. Hence the cooperation termination is proved.

2.2 SCC Subproblem 2/2

Here we consider the SCC { f77_0_descend_LE }.

2.2.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 7 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

f77_0_descend_LE: x1

2.2.2 Trivial Cooperation Program

There are no more "sharp" transitions in the cooperation program. Hence the cooperation termination is proved.

Tool configuration

AProVE