LTS Termination Proof

Input

Integer Transition System

Initial Location: l5, l4, l7, l6, l10, l8, l1, l0, l2, l9

Transitions: (pre-variables and post-variables)

l0	1	l1:	x1 = _iHAT0 ∧ x2 = _jHAT0 ∧ x3 = _tmp5HAT0 ∧ x4 = _x3HAT0 ∧ x5 = _y4HAT0 ∧ x1 = _iHATpost ∧ x2 = _jHATpost ∧ x3 = _tmp5HATpost ∧ x4 = _x3HATpost ∧ x5 = _y4HATpost ∧ _y4HAT0 = _y4HATpost ∧ _x3HAT0 = _x3HATpost ∧ _tmp5HAT0 = _tmp5HATpost ∧ _jHAT0 = _jHATpost ∧ _iHAT0 = _iHATpost
l2	2	l3:	x1 = _x ∧ x2 = _x1 ∧ x3 = _x2 ∧ x4 = _x3 ∧ x5 = _x4 ∧ x1 = _x5 ∧ x2 = _x6 ∧ x3 = _x7 ∧ x4 = _x8 ∧ x5 = _x9 ∧ _x4 = _x9 ∧ _x3 = _x8 ∧ _x2 = _x7 ∧ _x1 = _x6 ∧ _x = _x5
l4	3	l2:	x1 = _x10 ∧ x2 = _x11 ∧ x3 = _x12 ∧ x4 = _x13 ∧ x5 = _x14 ∧ x1 = _x15 ∧ x2 = _x16 ∧ x3 = _x17 ∧ x4 = _x18 ∧ x5 = _x19 ∧ _x14 = _x19 ∧ _x13 = _x18 ∧ _x12 = _x17 ∧ _x11 = _x16 ∧ _x10 = _x15
l5	4	l6:	x1 = _x20 ∧ x2 = _x21 ∧ x3 = _x22 ∧ x4 = _x23 ∧ x5 = _x24 ∧ x1 = _x25 ∧ x2 = _x26 ∧ x3 = _x27 ∧ x4 = _x28 ∧ x5 = _x29 ∧ _x24 = _x29 ∧ _x23 = _x28 ∧ _x22 = _x27 ∧ _x20 = _x25 ∧ _x26 = 1 + _x21
l6	5	l7:	x1 = _x30 ∧ x2 = _x31 ∧ x3 = _x32 ∧ x4 = _x33 ∧ x5 = _x34 ∧ x1 = _x35 ∧ x2 = _x36 ∧ x3 = _x37 ∧ x4 = _x38 ∧ x5 = _x39 ∧ _x34 = _x39 ∧ _x33 = _x38 ∧ _x32 = _x37 ∧ _x31 = _x36 ∧ _x30 = _x35
l8	6	l5:	x1 = _x40 ∧ x2 = _x41 ∧ x3 = _x42 ∧ x4 = _x43 ∧ x5 = _x44 ∧ x1 = _x45 ∧ x2 = _x46 ∧ x3 = _x47 ∧ x4 = _x48 ∧ x5 = _x49 ∧ _x41 = _x46 ∧ _x40 = _x45 ∧ _x47 = _x47 ∧ _x49 = 1 + _x41 ∧ _x48 = _x41
l8	7	l5:	x1 = _x50 ∧ x2 = _x51 ∧ x3 = _x52 ∧ x4 = _x53 ∧ x5 = _x54 ∧ x1 = _x55 ∧ x2 = _x56 ∧ x3 = _x57 ∧ x4 = _x58 ∧ x5 = _x59 ∧ _x54 = _x59 ∧ _x53 = _x58 ∧ _x52 = _x57 ∧ _x51 = _x56 ∧ _x50 = _x55
l7	8	l0:	x1 = _x60 ∧ x2 = _x61 ∧ x3 = _x62 ∧ x4 = _x63 ∧ x5 = _x64 ∧ x1 = _x65 ∧ x2 = _x66 ∧ x3 = _x67 ∧ x4 = _x68 ∧ x5 = _x69 ∧ _x64 = _x69 ∧ _x63 = _x68 ∧ _x62 = _x67 ∧ _x61 = _x66 ∧ _x65 = −1 + _x60 ∧ _x60 ≤ _x61
l7	9	l8:	x1 = _x70 ∧ x2 = _x71 ∧ x3 = _x72 ∧ x4 = _x73 ∧ x5 = _x74 ∧ x1 = _x75 ∧ x2 = _x76 ∧ x3 = _x77 ∧ x4 = _x78 ∧ x5 = _x79 ∧ _x74 = _x79 ∧ _x73 = _x78 ∧ _x72 = _x77 ∧ _x71 = _x76 ∧ _x70 = _x75 ∧ 1 + _x71 ≤ _x70
l1	10	l4:	x1 = _x80 ∧ x2 = _x81 ∧ x3 = _x82 ∧ x4 = _x83 ∧ x5 = _x84 ∧ x1 = _x85 ∧ x2 = _x86 ∧ x3 = _x87 ∧ x4 = _x88 ∧ x5 = _x89 ∧ _x84 = _x89 ∧ _x83 = _x88 ∧ _x82 = _x87 ∧ _x81 = _x86 ∧ _x80 = _x85 ∧ 1 + _x80 ≤ 0
l1	11	l6:	x1 = _x90 ∧ x2 = _x91 ∧ x3 = _x92 ∧ x4 = _x93 ∧ x5 = _x94 ∧ x1 = _x95 ∧ x2 = _x96 ∧ x3 = _x97 ∧ x4 = _x98 ∧ x5 = _x99 ∧ _x94 = _x99 ∧ _x93 = _x98 ∧ _x92 = _x97 ∧ _x91 = _x96 ∧ _x90 = _x95 ∧ 0 ≤ _x90
l9	12	l0:	x1 = _x100 ∧ x2 = _x101 ∧ x3 = _x102 ∧ x4 = _x103 ∧ x5 = _x104 ∧ x1 = _x105 ∧ x2 = _x106 ∧ x3 = _x107 ∧ x4 = _x108 ∧ x5 = _x109 ∧ _x104 = _x109 ∧ _x103 = _x108 ∧ _x102 = _x107 ∧ _x105 = 4 ∧ _x106 = 0
l10	13	l9:	x1 = _x110 ∧ x2 = _x111 ∧ x3 = _x112 ∧ x4 = _x113 ∧ x5 = _x114 ∧ x1 = _x115 ∧ x2 = _x116 ∧ x3 = _x117 ∧ x4 = _x118 ∧ x5 = _x119 ∧ _x114 = _x119 ∧ _x113 = _x118 ∧ _x112 = _x117 ∧ _x111 = _x116 ∧ _x110 = _x115

Proof

1 Switch to Cooperation Termination Proof

We consider the following cutpoint-transitions:

l5	l5	l5:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l4	l4	l4:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l7	l7	l7:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l6	l6	l6:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l10	l10	l10:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l8	l8	l8:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l1	l1	l1:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l0	l0	l0:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l2	l2	l2:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5
l9	l9	l9:	x1 = x1 ∧ x2 = x2 ∧ x3 = x3 ∧ x4 = x4 ∧ x5 = x5

and for every transition t, a duplicate t is considered.

2 SCC Decomposition

We consider subproblems for each of the 1 SCC(s) of the program graph.

2.1 SCC Subproblem 1/1

Here we consider the SCC { l5, l7, l6, l1, l8, l0 }.

2.1.1 Transition Removal

We remove transition 9 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l0:	x1 − x2
l1:	−1 + x1 − x2
l7:	−1 + x1 − x2
l6:	−1 + x1 − x2
l5:	−2 + x1 − x2
l8:	−2 + x1 − x2

2.1.2 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 7, 6 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l0:	−1
l1:	−1
l7:	−1
l6:	−1
l5:	−1
l8:	0

2.1.3 Transition Removal

We remove transition 4 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l0:	−1
l1:	−1
l7:	−1
l6:	−1
l5:	0

2.1.4 Transition Removal

We remove transition 11 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l0:	x1
l1:	x1
l7:	−1 + x1
l6:	−1 + x1

2.1.5 Transition Removal

We remove transitions 1, 8, 5 using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by 0.

l0:	0
l1:	−1
l7:	1
l6:	2

2.1.6 Trivial Cooperation Program

There are no more "sharp" transitions in the cooperation program. Hence the cooperation termination is proved.

Tool configuration

AProVE

version: AProVE Commit ID: unknown
strategy: Statistics for single proof: 100.00 % (8 real / 0 unknown / 0 assumptions / 8 total proof steps)