by T2Cert
| 0 | 0 | 1: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_post ≤ 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0: | 0 ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ 0 ∧ − x_post + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ x_post − x_post ≤ 0 ∧ − x_0 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ x_0 − x_0 ≤ 0 | 
The following invariants are asserted.
| 0: | TRUE | 
| 1: | −1 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − x_post ≤ 0 | 
| 2: | TRUE | 
The invariants are proved as follows.
| 0 | (0) | TRUE | ||
| 1 | (1) | −1 + x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − x_0 ≤ 0 ∧ −1 + x_post ≤ 0 ∧ 1 − x_post ≤ 0 | ||
| 2 | (2) | TRUE | 
| 0 | 0 1 | |
| 2 | 1 0 | 
We remove transitions , using the following ranking functions, which are bounded by −8.
| 2: | 0 | 
| 0: | 0 | 
| 1: | 0 | 
| : | −4 | 
| : | −5 | 
| : | −6 | 
There exist no SCC in the program graph.
T2Cert